Skip to content
  • PRO
  • Events
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
      • Influencers
      • Lexology European Awards 2026
      • Client Choice Dinner 2026
  • Lexology Compete
  • About
  • Help centre
  • Blog
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
Lexology Article

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register

Regulating the Future: A Safety First Approach to Automated Vehicles

DAC Beachcroft LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

United Kingdom March 9 2026

The latest call for evidence

Last December, as part of the implementation of the Automated Vehicles Act 2024, the Department for Transport issued 'developing the automated vehicles regulatory framework', the fourth call for evidence on implementing the Automated Vehicles Act 2024 since last summer. Unlike previous requests for stakeholder input, this one addresses a number of issues. DfT asked for views on many aspects of the automated vehicles regulatory framework, including:

  • Type approval;
  • Authorisation, user-in-charge and transition demands;
  • No-user-in-charge operator licensing;
  • Insurance;
  • Data collection;
  • Cyber security;
  • In-use regulation;
  • Monetary penalties; and
  • Incident investigation.

Our response

The call for evidence closed on 5 March. In our response, we highlighted several points, including:

  • The development and deployment of automated vehicles must be guided by a safety‑first principle.
  • As the government drafts the regulations needed to implement the Automated Vehicles Act, maintaining this focus on safety is essential - even where regulations introduce significant costs. Early investment in robust safety standards will build public trust and reduce long‑term costs.
  • Real‑world data from initial AV deployment will allow regulatory requirements to be safely re-examined over time, whereas tightening rules only after incidents would damage public confidence and increase costs for compensators and public services.

Our full response can be found here.

What's next

The government will publish a summary of responses with its own response in due course. The information collected as part of this exercise will be used to underpin the drafting of the regulations that will be required prior to allowing privately owned AVs on the UK's roads.

DAC Beachcroft LLP - Peter Allchorne, Joanna Folan and Michael McCabe

DAC Beachcroft is a broad-based international law firm serving a wide range of sectors with a strong heritage in insurance, health and real estate. With offices across the UK, Europe, Latin America, North America, and Asia Pacific, our clients have access to a global network of experienced lawyers. We combine excellent legal skills and cutting-edge delivery expertise to design solutions that fit the needs of our clients – often involving clever uses of technology.

Visit dacbeachcroft.com to learn more about our legal services, keep up to date on the latest legal developments and news, and get in touch.


Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • United Kingdom
  • IT & Data Protection
  • Shipping & Transport
  • DAC Beachcroft LLP

Topics

  • Cybersecurity

Popular articles from this firm

  1. The Rise of Digital Claims Fraud in Property Claims *
  2. New National Minimum Wage (NMW) rates announced *
  3. High Court dismisses interim application to block Ofwat enforcement publication *
  4. Tribunal wrong to reduce unfair dismissal compensation to zero where conduct was not gross misconduct *
  5. Religious discrimination: Tribunal failed to scrutinise whether reasons for not recruiting a Christian social worker were because of his religious beliefs *
Interested in contributing?
Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers.
Learn more
Powered by Lexology

Professional development

  • Upcoming Changes to the UK’s Cyber Security Law - The Cyber Security and Resilience Bill - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 1.25 CPD hours
    Online
    25 March 2026
  • AI Contracting: Ensuring Effectiveness, Safety & Compliance with the AI Act - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 2 CPD hours
    Online
    20 May 2026
  • Spotting the Fakes - How to Detect False Documents - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 1.25 CPD hours
    Online
    1 June 2026
View all

Related practical resources PRO

  • Checklist Checklist: Navigating DORA compliance: addressing practical post-implementation steps (EU)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to manage cybersecurity risk and compliance (UK)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to develop, implement and maintain a US information and data security compliance program (USA)
View all

Related research hubs

United Kingdom

Shipping & Transport

IT & Data Protection

Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Panoramic
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
  • Contracts & clauses
Lexology Index
  • Find an expert
  • Reports
  • Research methodology
  • Submissions
  • FAQ
  • Instruct Counsel
  • Client Choice 2025
More
  • About us
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Help centre
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • TwitterFollow on X
  • LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2026 Law Business Research

Law Business Research