Skip to content
  • PRO
  • Events
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
      • Influencers
      • Lexology European Awards 2026
      • Client Choice Dinner 2026
  • Lexology Compete
  • About
  • Help centre
  • Blog
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
Lexology Article

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register

Asia: trade secrets and intellectual property

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

Hong Kong, Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand March 18 2021

As more employees continue to work from home on a sustained basis, there is a heightened risk of trade secrets or confidential information leaking or being misused. It is important for businesses to understand the protection afforded at law in respect of their information and to consider ways to ensure it is protected. We take a look at some of these issues.

Questions

Is there a statutory definition of trade secrets or confidential information?

Hong Kong No.

Yes.

Indonesia

Singapore No.

Yes.

Thailand

There is no statutory definition of "trade secrets" or "confidential information", which are concepts governed by common law.

In deciding whether information constitutes confidential information, the following factors are taken into account: (a) the nature of the

employment; (b) the nature of the

information; (c) whether the employer

impressed on the employee the confidential nature of the information; and (d) whether the information can be easily isolated from other information which the employee is free to use or disclose.

Under the Law No 30 of 2000 on Trade Secrets (Trade Secrets Law), the phrase "trade secrets" means information in the technology and/or business field that is inaccessible to the public, has economic value, has its confidential nature maintained by the employer. This includes methods of production, methods of processing and methods of selling.

Although there is no clear definition of confidential information, the Trade Secrets Law provides that information is considered as confidential if it is only accessible to limited number of persons or is generally inaccessible to the public.

There is no statutory definition of "trade secrets" or "confidential information", which are concepts governed by common law.

To bring a claim for breach of confidence, the information must have the necessary quality of confidence about it and imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence. Once this is satisfied, an action for breach of confidence is presumed and the defendant must show that their conscience is not affected in the circumstances (eg they come across the information by accident).

Under the Thai Trade Secrets Act B.E. 2545 (2002) (TSA), the term "trade secrets" means "trade information" which is confidential (ie not widely known), has commercial value due to its secrecy and has its confidential nature protected by its owner.

Under the TSA, "trade information" can take in any form as long as it conveys statement, story, fact, etc. and includes formula, form, compilations or assembled works, programs, methods, techniques or processes.

To show that the information has the necessary quality of confidence, the information

1

Questions

Hong Kong

Information amounting to a trade secret must be: (a) used in a trade or

business; (b) confidential, i.e. not

already in the public domain; (c) easily isolated from other information which is not considered confidential; (d) liable to cause real or significant harm to the owner, if disclosed to a competitor; and (e) treated as being confidential (e.g. via controls and access restrictions, instructions to employees etc.).

Indonesia

Singapore

must not already be available to the public at large.

In deciding whether a piece of information is a trade secret, the following factors are taken into account: (a) the nature of the

employment; (b) the nature of the

information itself; (c) whether the employer

impressed on the employee the confidentiality of the information; and (d) whether the information can be easily isolated from other information which the employee is free to use.

Thailand

During and after employment, are employees required by law to protect confidential information or not to use trade secrets?

Yes in part.

During the course of employment, employees owe an implied duty to maintain confidentiality of information belonging to the employer and not to use trade secrets.

However, upon termination of employment, such implied duty becomes more restricted in

There is no specific obligation in the Indonesian labour laws which requires employees to protect confidential information or not to use trade secrets.

However, under the Trade Secrets Law, the employer, as the owner of trade secrets or license recipient, has a right to commence an action for direct damages and injunctive relief

Yes in part.

During the course of employment, employees owe an implied duty to maintain confidentiality of information belonging to the employer and not to use trade secrets.

However, upon termination of employment, such implied duty becomes more restricted in

There is no specific obligation in the Thai labour laws which requires employees to protect confidential information or not to use trade secrets.

However, employees are generally prohibited from intentionally causing damage to the employer and from committing any act in a manner incompatible with the

2

Questions

Hong Kong

scope and only applies insofar as the information amounts to trade secret.

Thus, it is important for employers to require employees to enter into a clearly drafted non-disclosure agreement as a condition of employment or to include a confidentiality protection in the employment contract.

Where the parties enter into a separation agreement upon termination of employment, such confidentiality provision can also be included in the agreement.

Indonesia

Singapore

against any person (including an employee) who deliberately and without authorisation discloses their trade secrets.

It is important for employers to require employees to enter into a clearly drafted nondisclosure agreement as a condition of employment or to include a confidentiality protection in the employment contract.

Where the parties enter into a separation agreement upon termination of employment, such confidentiality provision can also be included in the agreement.

scope and only applies insofar as the information amounts to trade secret.

Thus, it is important for employers to require employees to enter into a clearly drafted non-disclosure agreement as a condition of employment or to include a confidentiality protection in the employment contract.

Where the parties enter into a separation agreement upon termination of employment, such confidentiality provision can also be included in the agreement.

Thailand

due and faithful discharge of the employee's duty.

Further, under the TSA, any person who discloses trade secrets belonging others which results in such information no longer remaining trade secrets with malicious intent to cause damage to the business of the trade secrets' owner is liable to imprisonment for a term of not exceeding one year, or to a fine of not exceeding THB 200,000, or to both.

It is important for employers to require employees to enter into a clearly drafted nondisclosure agreement as a condition of employment or to include a confidentiality protection in the employment contract.

Where the parties enter into a separation agreement upon termination of employment, such confidentiality provision can also be included in the agreement.

3

Questions

Who owns IP rights created by employees in the course of their employment?

Hong Kong

Under the common law, the employer owns all IP rights that its employees create in the course of their employment, unless otherwise agreed.

There are also various statutory provisions applicable to the ownership of IP rights, including: (a) section 14 of the Copyright

Ordinance and section 3(3) of the Registered Designs Ordinance which similarly provide that an employer is treated as the first owner of the rights in work product created by employees in the course of employment, unless otherwise agreed by the parties; and (b) section 57 of the Patents Ordinance which provides that an invention by an employee is taken to belong to the employer if it was made in the course of the employee's normal duties and in circumstances where the invention might reasonably be expected to result from

Indonesia

This depends on the specific type of IP rights created.

Under the Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyrights, if a work is made within an employment relationship or based on an order, the party who creates such work is deemed to be the `creator' and the `copyright holder' unless otherwise agreed.

Under the Law No. 13 of 2016 on Patents, the party who is entitled to the patent for an invention produced in an employment relationship is the party who assigned the work (even though the inventions are created by employees using the employer's facilities), unless otherwise agreed.

Where the employer's business is such that protection of employee rights is crucial, these rights should be expressly dealt with either in the employment contract or in some other agreements.

Singapore

Under the common law, the employer owns all IP rights that its employees create in the course of their employment, unless otherwise agreed.

There are also various statutory provisions applicable to the ownership of IP rights, including: (a) section 30(6) of the

Copyright Act which provides that an employer is entitled to any copyright subsisting in the work product created by employees in the course of employment (specific rules apply relating to literary work etc. for publications and photograph etc. taken pursuant to an agreement); (b) section 49(1)(a) of the Patents Act which provides that an invention by an employee is taken to belong to the employer if it was made in the course of the employee's normal duties and in circumstances where the invention might reasonably be expected to result from

Thailand

This depends on the specific type of IP rights created.

Under the Thai Copyright Act B.E. 2357 (1994), an employee owns the copyright for a work that has been created in the course of employment unless otherwise agreed in writing. However, an employer is entitled to communicate such work to the public in accordance with the purpose of employment.

Under the Thai Patent Act B.E. 2522 (1979), an employer has the right to apply for a patent for the employee's invention in the course of employment, unless the employment contract provides otherwise.

Where the employer's business is such that protection of employee rights is crucial, these rights should be expressly dealt with either in the employment contract or in other applicable agreements.

4

Questions

Hong Kong

the carrying out of their duties.

Where the employer's business is such that protection of employee rights is crucial, these rights should be expressly dealt with either in the employment contract or in a separate agreement.

Indonesia

Singapore

the carrying out of their duties.

Where the employer's business is such that protection of employee rights is crucial, these rights should be expressly dealt with either in the employment contract or in a separate agreement.

Thailand

5


Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • Hong Kong
  • Indonesia
  • Singapore
  • Thailand
  • Employment & Labor
  • Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Topics

  • Non-disclosure agreement

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Hong Kong Stock Exchange amends ongoing public float requirements for listed companies *
  2. Hong Kong Stock Exchange issues FAQs to clarify the new ongoing public float regime launched on 1 January 2026 *
  3. Shifting gears: Regulatory readiness for autonomous vehicles in Asia *
  4. What do stablecoins mean for banks and the future of finance? *
  5. Online safety: A global regulatory overview *
Interested in contributing?
Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers.
Learn more
Powered by Lexology

Professional development

  • Protecting IP for Screenwriters & TV Format Creators - An Introduction for Lawyers

    MBL Seminars | 3 CPD hours
    London
    7 September 2026
  • Navigating Subject Access Requests - A Guide for Advisers - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 3 CPD hours
    Online
    19 February 2026
  • An Introduction to the Court of Protection - With Mike O’Brien KC - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 6 CPD hours
    Online
    20 February 2026
View all

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: Overview of US employment law (USA)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to draft the key provisions of an employee handbook (USA)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to use arbitration agreements in employment (USA)
View all

Related research hubs

Non-disclosure agreement

Hong Kong

Thailand

Employment & Labor

Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Panoramic
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
  • Contracts & clauses
Lexology Index
  • Find an expert
  • Reports
  • Research methodology
  • Submissions
  • FAQ
  • Instruct Counsel
  • Client Choice 2025
More
  • About us
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Help centre
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • TwitterFollow on X
  • LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2026 Law Business Research

Law Business Research