Skip to content
  • PRO
  • Events
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
      • Influencers
      • Lexology European Awards 2026
      • Client Choice Dinner 2026
  • Lexology Compete
  • About
  • Help centre
  • Blog
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
Lexology Article

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register

Deepfake Legislation: A Nationwide Survey—State and Federal Lawmakers Consider Legislation to Regulate Manipulated Media

WilmerHale

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

USA September 25 2019

Federal and state lawmakers across the nation are considering legislation to address what they see as the rising dangers of “deepfakes.” Deepfakes are false yet highly realistic artificial intelligence (AI)-created video, audio and text. A sophisticated deepfake video can show people saying things they never said and doing things they never did. 

About a dozen bills have been introduced in the US Congress and state legislatures in the past year that address deepfakes in one form or another. Two bills have already become criminal law— one in Virginia, criminalizing nonconsensual deepfake pornography, and one in Texas, criminalizing deepfakes that interfere with elections. Two other bills passed by the California legislature in September 2019 await the Governor’s signature. They would allow victims of nonconsensual deepfake pornography to sue for damages and give candidates for public office the ability to sue individuals or organizations that create or share election-related deepfakes without warning labels near Election Day. 

The proposed and enacted laws share several common characteristics. 

  1.  Reports. Five bills pending before the US Congress would require federal agencies to brief lawmakers or write reports on the current state of deepfake technology, deepfake countermeasures, and any changes needed to laws and regulations to respond to the threats posed by such manipulated media (see H.R. 2500, H.R. 3600/S. 2065; H.R. 3494; S. 1348.; see also H.R. 3230 (requiring annual reports in addition to imposing new criminal penalties on certain deepfakes)).
  2. Nonconsensual Deepfake Pornography. One state (Virginia, Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-386.2) has adopted a law, and Congress and a few other states are considering others, to ban the use of deepfake technology to produce or distribute nonconsensual pornography (see H.R. 3230; Calif. AB-1280; Calif. AB-602; N.Y. A08155, S0587-B).
  3. Elections. Texas has adopted a measure outlawing the creation or distribution of deepfake videos of candidates for public office intended to injure the candidate or influence elections (Tex. SB 751). California (Calif. AB-730; Calif. AB-1280) and the US Congress (H.R. 3230) are considering similar bills.
WilmerHale - Matthew F. Ferraro

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • USA
  • Internet & Social Media
  • IT & Data Protection
  • Media & Entertainment
  • Public
  • WilmerHale

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Client Alert: SDNY Launches Revised Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Program for Financial Crimes *
  2. Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Amendments to Delaware General Corporation Law § 144 *
  3. State Regulation of Data Centers: Emerging Trends and Potential Legal Complexities *
  4. Federal Circuit Patent Watch: Federal Circuit Affirms Liability for Patent-Related Antitrust Counterclaims—18,000+ Sales Support Substantial Non-Infringing Use *
  5. Diplomacy Meets Deal-Making: How U.S. Companies Can Harness Government Resources to Promote Overseas Investment and Operations *
Interested in contributing?
Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers.
Learn more
Powered by Lexology

Professional development

  • Mastering Data Processing Agreements - Drafting, Negotiating & Mitigating Risk- Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 4 CPD hours
    Online
    12 May 2026
  • Implementing & Maintaining Data Retention & Data Management Policies - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 1.5 CPD hours
    Online
    15 September 2026
  • Education Law Update - What’s New? - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 3 CPD hours
    Online
    11 March 2026
View all

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to establish a social media governance framework (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: Legal considerations for social media marketing (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: Policy for employee use of an organization’s social media accounts (USA)
View all

Related research hubs

USA

IT & Data Protection

Internet & Social Media

Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Panoramic
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
  • Contracts & clauses
Lexology Index
  • Find an expert
  • Reports
  • Research methodology
  • Submissions
  • FAQ
  • Instruct Counsel
  • Client Choice 2025
More
  • About us
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Help centre
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • TwitterFollow on X
  • LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2026 Law Business Research

Law Business Research