Skip to content
  • PRO
  • Events
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
      • Influencers
      • Lexology European Awards 2026
      • Client Choice Dinner 2026
  • Lexology Compete
  • About
  • Help centre
  • Blog
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
Lexology Article

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register

China reforms its review and approval systems for drugs and medical devices

Sidley Austin LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

China August 19 2015

On August 18, 2015, China’s State Council issued an important document, the Opinions on Reforming Review and Approval Process for Drugs and Medical Devices (the RAP Opinions). The RAP Opinions require China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) to finish its backlog of drug applications by the end of 2016 and to follow strictly its statutory review and approval timeline beginning in 2018. In addition, the RAP Opinions offer directions to reform the existing review and approval systems. The highlights are:

  • The current drug classification system will be changed. “New drugs” will be defined as drugs not marketed anywhere in the world and further categorized into innovative new drugs and improved new drugs; “generic drugs” currently defined as “drugs having existing national standards” will be re-defined as “drugs having equivalent quality and efficacy with the originators’ drugs.” 
  • Innovative drugs will get expedited review and approval. Certain drugs will be entitled to a fast-track review and approval by CFDA, including (i) innovative drugs treating HIV, malignant tumors, severe infectious diseases and rare diseases; (ii) innovative drugs and pediatric drugs for which manufacturing is transferred to China; (iii) innovative drugs with advanced formulation techniques, innovative treatment methods or apparent treatment advantages; (iv) drugs responding to urgent clinical demand; and (iv) drugs developed under special national research and development programs of China. 
  • A market authorization holder (MAH) system will be implemented on a trial basis for drugs. Research and development institutions and research personnel may apply for drug approvals in their own names and when the approved technologies are transferred for manufacturing, the manufacturers will only be subject to CFDA’s on-site inspection and product testing, with no additional technical reviews.  
  • The clinical trial approval regime will be improved. Parallel clinical studies can be conducted in China for new drugs that have not been marketed in other countries, and approvals on clinical trials for innovative drugs will focus on clinical value and protection of study subjects. 
  • The current approval processes for drug packaging materials and excipients will be simplified. Packaging materials and excipients will be reviewed and approved together with the underlying drugs; a corresponding drug master file system is expected to be established.  
  • The current medical device review and approval system will also be reformed. Devices with core technologies covered by invention patents and with significant clinical value will be given review priority. 

The RAP Opinions will likely reshape China’s existing review and approval systems, especially for drugs, which will significantly impact the regulatory strategies of innovative companies for the China market. CFDA is expected to develop detailed implementing regulations following the principles in the RAP Opinions and the national law and regulations on drugs are also expected to be amended accordingly. In particular, it remains to be seen how the currently-defined new drugs, especially those marketed in other countries, but not yet in China, will fit in the new drug classification system, and how CFDA will implement the MAH system in the near future.

Sidley Austin LLP - Chen Yang and Ling Su

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • China
  • Healthcare & Life Sciences
  • Product Regulation & Liability
  • Sidley Austin LLP

Topics

  • Medical device

Popular articles from this firm

  1. U.S. Trade Representative Proposes to Increase Section 301 Duties on China-Origin Products *
  2. The China Food and Drug Administration’s 2017 Reform Efforts Highlighted Seven Priorities *
  3. Are China-only Clinical Trials Enough for U.S. Approvals? *
  4. Asia Funds & Financial Services Newsletter *
  5. China promulgates draft Good Supply Practices for Medical Devices *
Interested in contributing?
Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers.
Learn more
Powered by Lexology

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to avoid liability for defective products in supply of goods agreements (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: Conducting a competition compliance audit (EU)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: Protecting intellectual property when drafting sales or marketing agreements (USA)
View all

Related research hubs

China

Healthcare & Life Sciences

Product Regulation & Liability

Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Panoramic
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
  • Contracts & clauses
Lexology Index
  • Find an expert
  • Reports
  • Research methodology
  • Submissions
  • FAQ
  • Instruct Counsel
  • Client Choice 2025
More
  • About us
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Help centre
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • TwitterFollow on X
  • LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2026 Law Business Research

Law Business Research