Skip to content
  • PRO
  • Events
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
      • Influencers
      • Lexology European Awards 2026
      • Client Choice Dinner 2026
  • Lexology Compete
  • About
  • Help centre
  • Blog
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
Lexology Article

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register

European Union Sustainability Outlook

Squire Patton Boggs

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

European Union October 30 2023

After the summer recess, the proposal for a Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation was the subject of intensive negotiations in the EU Parliament and the Council. Both institutions want to introduce significant changes to the EU Commission’s proposal. From the Parliament’s perspective, implementation of a recycled content credit system turned out to be the most contentious amendment. The solution was thought to allow producers of plastic packaging to meet recycled content targets by purchasing credits from entities that exceed the required targets – but was eventually rejected by shadow rapporteurs. The vote on the proposal in the Environmental Committee of the EU Parliament to place on October 24, just under a month before the plenary session vote planned for November 20. The Environment Council will deliberate on the proposal on December 18. Waste Framework Directive – Rapporteur Proposes Extension of Its Scope The EU Commission adopted its proposal for revision of the Waste Framework Directive in July. The revision focuses primarily on the EU’s growing textile waste problem and its ineffective waste management practices. The proposal introduces a mandatory Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme, designed to make producers responsible for the costs of end-of-life management of textile products, apparel, clothing accessories and footwear they place on the market. The proposal is currently under examination in the EU Parliament and by the Council. The work of both co-legislators is progressing at a fairly rapid pace. The draft report of the file’s rapporteur of the Environmental Committee has already been made available; the document suggests extending the future rules to two more product categories – mattresses and carpets – whose waste is likely to end up being incinerated. The committee is tentatively scheduled to vote on the draft report and amendments on February 14, with voting on the plenary session of the EU Parliament slated for March 11. The proposal will be subject to the deliberations of the Agriculture and Fisheries Council, which will take place between October 23 and 24. EU Commission Adopts Restriction on Intentionally Added Microplastics – The Act Is Now Published The EU Commission regulation restricting – under Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) – microplastics intentionally added to products, was published in the Official Journal of the EU on September 27, and its provisions entered into force on October 17. The proposal prohibits placing on the market microplastics as substances on their own, or in mixtures, added to obtain the desired characteristics of product. Microplastics in certain applications will be exempted from the restriction, but their suppliers might be subject to certain reporting and information obligations. Restriction will not apply, for instance, to microplastics for use at industrial sites. Nevertheless, specific entities handling these microplastics will be obligated in the future to (i) provide guidelines to industrial users on preventing microplastics release and (ii) submit annual reports to the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) concerning pellet losses, both on-site and during transport. The ban’s transition periods will vary depending on the application of the microplastics, with the timeframes ranging from four years for rinse-off cosmetics to as long as 12 years for makeup products, all counted from the proposal’s entry into force. Environment 2 EU Commission Adopts Delayed and Reduced Proposal on Unintentional Release of Microplastics On October 16, the EU Commission adopted the proposal for a regulation on preventing plastic pellet losses to reduce microplastic pollution. The act was originally intended to have much broader scope and to also target, in addition to plastic pellets, tires and synthetic textiles. Its scope was scaled down as negotiating such an extensive dossier before the upcoming parliamentary elections would have posed significant challenges. The limited proposal will target handling of plastic pellets at all stages of the supply chain. The regulation will apply to (i) operators of installations handling over five tons of plastic pellets, as well as (ii) carriers of plastic pellets, with varying obligations for EU and non-EU carriers. As a general principle, both operators and carriers will be required to avoid pellet losses. Operators will need to establish a risk assessment plan for each of their installations. Micro and small enterprises will be allowed to self-declare conformity with this obligation to the authorities – an exemption that also extends to medium and large enterprises handling less than 1,000 tons of plastic pellets annually. Other entities will be obliged to obtain third-party certification. Member states will be obliged to ensure that individuals are allowed to claim and obtain compensation for “damage to human health which occurred as a result of an infringement of this regulation”. The proposal specifies that the new requirements, with limited exceptions, will be applicable 18 months after the regulation’s entry into force. The dossier will then be forwarded to the EU Parliament and the Council for further legislative deliber

Squire Patton Boggs - Wolfgang A. Maschek, Thomas Delille, Christina Economides, Nina Kusnierkiewicz and Valerio Giovannini

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • European Union
  • Environment & Climate Change
  • Product Regulation & Liability
  • Squire Patton Boggs

Popular articles from this firm

  1. What to expect on the EU Deforestation-free Regulation in 2026 *
  2. Towards a Contextual Concept of Personal Data Under the GDPR: the Commission Moves Forward, the EDPB and EDPS Push Back *
  3. Multi-club Ownership: The Rise and Regulation of Sport’s Portfolio Era *
  4. Les décisions contraignantes du CEPD/EDPB peuvent être contestées directement devant les juridictions de l’Union européenne *
  5. Italian Law no. 132/2025 - The First Domestic Law in the European Union on the Use of Artificial Intelligence *
Interested in contributing?
Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers.
Learn more
Powered by Lexology

Professional development

  • Contaminated Land - Avoiding the Pitfalls for Property Professionals - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 1.5 CPD hours
    Online
    29 April 2026
  • Planning Law in Practice - A Masterclass - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 2.5 CPD hours
    Online
    15 May 2026
  • Planning & Consents for Renewable Energy Projects in England & Scotland - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 2 CPD hours
    Online
    19 May 2026
View all

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: Business and legal developments related to climate change (USA) Recently updated
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to approach and implement an ESG strategy (Global) Recently updated
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to understand and implement the ‘S’ in environmental, social and governance (ESG) (Global)
View all

Related research hubs

European Union

Product Regulation & Liability

Environment & Climate Change

Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Panoramic
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
  • Contracts & clauses
Lexology Index
  • Find an expert
  • Reports
  • Research methodology
  • Submissions
  • FAQ
  • Instruct Counsel
  • Client Choice 2025
More
  • About us
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Help centre
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • TwitterFollow on X
  • LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2026 Law Business Research

Law Business Research