Skip to content
  • PRO
  • Events
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
      • Influencers
      • Lexology European Awards 2026
      • Client Choice Dinner 2026
  • Lexology Compete
  • About
  • Help centre
  • Blog
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
Lexology Article

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register

The Do’s and Don’ts of Further Processing

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

European Union, USA August 6 2020

Further processing is the standard remedy whenever a deadline is missed during prosecution of a European patent application.

The requirements for an allowable request for further processing are:

  • The request must relate to a failed time limit arising in the course of prosecution of a patent application before the EPO. Actions before national offices are not covered by further processing. Nor are time limits which arise in post grant procedures such as oppositions or limitation actions.
  • The failure to act must give rise to a loss of rights
  • The time limit must not be excluded from further processing (see list below)
  • The further processing fee must be paid
  • All the omitted acts must be completed (there may be multiple acts)
  • The payment of the fee and the completion of the omitted acts must be carried out within two months of notification of the loss of rights (see example below)

Example:

No, there are three different types of further processing fees.

  • If the omission relates to the non-payment of a fee, then the fee for further processing is a 50% uplift of that fee.
  • If the omission does not relate to the payment of a fee, then a fixed fee, currently €265, is due.
  • Finally, failure to file claims translations and deal with other formalities arising when the EPO issue a proposed text for grant is a special case, as despite the fact that fees are payable, no uplift of unpaid fees is payable, rather only a fixed fee is due.

Whilst the amount of the further processing fee is fixed by the EPC, the number of fees due can depend on the nature of the missed Communication. Applicants should therefore always check how many acts and fees are due.

Examples of some of the more common missed deadlines and the acts and fees which are due are set out below:

Filing fee and additional page fees not paid

  1. Payment of filing fee and additional page fee
  2. Payment of 50% uplift of filing fee + 50% uplift of additional page fee

Search fee not paid

  1. Payment of search fee
  2. Payment of 50% uplift of search fee

Failure to respond to search opinion and pay examination and designation fees

  1. Provide written response to search opinion
  2. Payment of examination and designation fees
  3. Payment of fixed further processing fee in respect of the failure to provide response to search opinion
  4. Payment of 50% uplift of the examination and designation fees

Failure to request examination and pay examination fees

  1. Provide written request for examination
  2. Payment of examination fee
  3. Payment of fixed further processing fee in respect of the failure to request examination; and
  4. Payment of a 50% uplift of the examination fee

Failure to enter regional phase before 31-month deadline

  1. Payment examination, designation and search fees due
  2. Formally request examination of application
  3. Pay fixed fee in respect of failure to request examination
  4. Payment of 50% of examination, designation and search fees Plus, if the PCT application was not published in English, French or German:
  5. File translation of application
  6. Payment of fixed further processing fee for late filing of translation

Failure to respond to examination report

  1. File response
  2. Payment of fixed further processing fee

Failure to respond to the issuance of a proposed text for grant under Rule 71(3) EPC when no excess claims fees are due

  1. Payment of fixed further processing fee
  2. Pay grant and publishing fees (no extra uplift)
  3. File translation of claims in the two official EPO languages (other than language of proceedings)

Failure to respond to the issuance of a proposed text for grant under Rule 71(3) EPC when excess claims fees are due

Same as above plus:

4. Payment of excess claims fees 5. Payment of 50% uplift of excess claims fees

No. Although further processing is available to remedy most missed deadlines, some deadlines are excluded from further processing. In many cases this is because either the deadlines are administrative in nature (e.g. the deadlines for filing appeals or for requesting further processing themselves) or else because the EPC provides other remedies if those deadlines are missed.

Specifically, further processing is ruled out for the following:

  • Loss of rights to priority due to failing to file a patent application before the end of the priority period or failure to file or correct a declaration of priority in good time
  • Loss of rights to due to failure to file grounds of appeal or a notice of appeal or a petition for review
  • Loss of rights due to a failure to file a request for further processing or a request for re-establishment of rights
  • Failing to correct certain formalities when filing an application including:
    • Failing to provide a translation of an application which is not in English, French or German or failing to file a copy and translation of a previous application when an application is made through reference to an earlier application not in English, French or German.
    • Failing to correct deficiencies to obtain a filing date, missing drawings and other formal matters when filing an application
    • Failing to deposit biological material in support of an application in good time
  • Failing to file a replacement application or request assumption of prosecution of an application following a court decision on entitlement
  • Failing to pay a renewal fee with or without an uplift for late payment, including renewal fees due on filing a divisional application or which fall due following re-establishment of a lapsed application or a successful petition for review
  • Failure to engage with the Search Division when issues arise when a search is to be carried out including:
    • Failing to identify independent claims to be searched or provide the EPO with a statement of subject matter to be searched when requested to do so by the EPO
    • Failing to pay further search fees when the claims of an application are found to lack unity

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • European Union
  • USA
  • Designs and trade secrets
  • Patents
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Popular articles from this firm

  1. IP5 Offices - Continuing Application Practice in the IP5 Offices *
  2. UPC’s Court of Appeal Overturns First Instance Decision in Amgen v. Sanofi and Regeneron *
  3. Injunctive Relief for Standard Essential Patents in International Jurisdictions *
  4. Oddity of Examination of Certain Corporate Witnesses in the U.S. v. Germany *
  5. Breaking Down the EPO’s Revised Practice Guidelines *
Interested in contributing?
Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers.
Learn more
Powered by Lexology

Professional development

  • Disclosure - A Litigator's Guide - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 1.25 CPD hours
    Online
    13 March 2026
  • Thatchers v Aldi & the Law on ‘Dupes’ - Where Are We Now? - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 1.5 CPD hours
    Online
    9 April 2026
  • Drafting & Negotiating Clinical Trial Agreements - Key IP & Data Protection Considerations - Learn Live

    MBL Seminars | 4 CPD hours
    Online
    21 April 2026
View all

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: Protecting intellectual property when drafting sales or marketing agreements (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: Drafting a limited intellectual property license (USA)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to protect trade secrets in the employment relationship (USA)
View all

Related research hubs

European Union

USA

Designs and trade secrets

Patents

Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Panoramic
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
  • Contracts & clauses
Lexology Index
  • Find an expert
  • Reports
  • Research methodology
  • Submissions
  • FAQ
  • Instruct Counsel
  • Client Choice 2025
More
  • About us
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Help centre
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • TwitterFollow on X
  • LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2026 Law Business Research

Law Business Research