Skip to content
  • PRO
  • Events
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
      • Influencers
      • Lexology European Awards 2026
      • Client Choice Dinner 2026
  • Lexology Compete
  • About
  • Help centre
  • Blog
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
  • Login
  • Register
  • PRO
Lexology Article

Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service.

Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page.

Register

The escalating cost of counterfeiting

Lane Powell PC

To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. Download Adobe Acrobat Reader

If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF .

Global November 10 2015

50 LEGAL BRIEFS Sponsored legal report Counterfeiting is one of the fastest growing economic crimes of modern times. The rapid expansion of the Internet has only compounded the problem in recent years. The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) estimates that in 2015 the value of counterfeit goods globally will exceed $1.7 trillion, or over 2 percent of the world’s economy. This estimate does not include the nonmonetary damages caused by injuries or death from counterfeit products. While counterfeiters continue to reap significant profits, millions of consumers are at risk from unsafe and ineffective products. Product counterfeiting has been appropriately described by many as the “crime of the 21st century.” As noted by the ICC, “what was once a cottage industry has now become a highly sophisticated network of organized crime that has the capacity to threaten the very fabric of national economies, endanger safety and frequently kill. It devalues corporate reputations, hinders investment, funds terrorism, and costs hundreds of thousands of people their livelihood every year.” Counterfeits are in every country and every industry sector. Counterfeits affect what we eat, what we watch, what medicines we take and what we wear — and all too often the link between fake goods and transnational organized crime is overlooked in the search for knock-offs at bargain-basement prices. Counterfeiting is a hugely lucrative business, with criminals relying on the continued high demand for cheap goods coupled with low production and distribution costs. Counterfeiters engage in elaborate plans to disguise their activities. They establish fictitious businesses and front companies. They exploit border-control weaknesses and poor regulatory frameworks. They use false documents to obtain pharmaceutical ingredients, as well as manufacturing equipment to replicate genuine products. The criminal networks behind counterfeiting operate across national borders in activities that include the manufacture, export, import and distribution of illicit goods. Counterfeiting affects companies, governments and individuals in a myriad of ways. Counterfeits create an underground trade that deprives governments of revenue for vital public services and imposes greater burdens on taxpayers. The ICC claims that the cost of lost tax revenue and additional welfare spending due to counterfeit goods is as much as $125 billion in developed countries alone. Counterfeiting also leads to more public resources being spent on fraud-detection methods by public sector authorities and larger intelligence, as well as the need for policing budgets to counter sophisticated schemes and networks. Furthermore, counterfeiting can significantly reduce the profitability of legitimate businesses and cause financial turmoil due to low product turnover; stolen knowhow; lost jobs; wrongful lawsuits caused by counterfeited products; and price hikes following beefed-up security systems used to counter organized criminal activities and investments in research and development (R&D). Counterfeiters become competitors of legitimate companies. As a result, companies lose sales and market share. Making matters worse, counterfeiters have an unfair advantage because they have no R&D-related costs or investments in brand development. Therefore, counterfeiters leech profits from American businesses in ways that no legitimate competitor can. Counterfeiters also erode the value of the brands they counterfeit. As low-quality, inexpensive fakes flood the market, and as more and more customers are deceived by bogus goods, the market demand, and thus the market price of a particular brand, declines substantially. Customers who inadvertently purchase counterfeit goods may conclude that the brand has failed to deliver on its promise of quality. The damage to the company can be further compounded if that disgruntled customer stops purchasing products of a particular brand. One of the most harmful forms of counterfeit goods is fraudulent medicines. In recent years there has been a marked increase in the manufacturing, trade and consumption of these products — often with harmful results, and at times fatal. The World Health Organization estimates that up to 1 percent of medicines available in the developed world are likely to be fraudulent. Tampered formulations present particular dangers. In some cases, fraudulent medicines have been found to contain highly toxic substances, or to contain fractional amounts of active formulations or even none at all. Unfortunately, individual businesses cannot solve the problem on their own, nor can individual consumers or even individual governments. Cooperation between these entities at a global — not just national — level is crucial for stemming counterfeiting and its ill effects. Consumers, businesses, trade associations, regulatory agencies, local and national law enforcement, the federal government and foreign governments must all work together to fight a common enemy. n Julianne R. Davis is Counsel to the Firm at Lane Powell, where she focuses her practice exclusively on intellectual property matters, with an emphasis on litigation and strategic counseling. She can be reached at [email protected] or 503.778.2118 The Escalating Cost of Counterfeiting BY JULIANNE R. DAVIS “Counterfeits devalue corporate reputations, hinder investments, fund terrorism and cost hundreds of thousands of people their livelihoods every year.” 


Back Forward
  • Save & file
  • View original
  • Forward
  • Share
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • WhatsApp
  • Follow
    Please login to follow content.
  • Like
  • Instruct

add to folder:

  • My saved (default)
  • Read later
Folders shared with you

Filed under

  • Global
  • Intellectual Property
  • Product Regulation & Liability
  • Lane Powell PC

Topics

  • Counterfeit
  • Terrorism

Organisations

  • International Chamber of Commerce

Popular articles from this firm

  1. Sales and use taxes in Washington *
  2. State and Local Taxes in Washington *
  3. Corporate income and franchise taxes in Washington *
  4. The State of Domain Names *
  5. A clean sweep for F. Hoffmann-La Roche domains *
Interested in contributing?
Get closer to winning business faster with Lexology's complete suite of dynamic products designed to help you unlock new opportunities with our highly engaged audience of legal professionals looking for answers.
Learn more
Powered by Lexology

Professional development

  • Technology & the Law - 2026 Virtual Conference

    MBL Seminars | 5 CPD hours
    Online
    20 April 2026
View all

Related practical resources PRO

  • How-to guide How-to guide: How to avoid liability for defective products in supply of goods agreements (USA)
  • How-to guide How-to guide: Countering the importation of counterfeit goods (USA)
  • Checklist Checklist: Ensuring a contract is valid (UK)
View all

Related research hubs

Global

Product Regulation & Liability

Intellectual Property

Resources
  • Daily newsfeed
  • Panoramic
  • Research hubs
  • Learn
  • In-depth
  • Lexy: AI search
  • Scanner
  • Contracts & clauses
Lexology Index
  • Find an expert
  • Reports
  • Research methodology
  • Submissions
  • FAQ
  • Instruct Counsel
  • Client Choice 2025
More
  • About us
  • Legal Influencers
  • Firms
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Popular
  • Lexology Academic
  • Lexology Talent Management
Legal
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
Contact
  • Help centre
  • Contact
  • RSS feeds
  • Submissions
 
  • Login
  • Register
  • TwitterFollow on X
  • LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

© Copyright 2006 - 2026 Law Business Research

Law Business Research