We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Results 1 to 5 of 14
Most popular |Most recent

Amendments to CEQA Guidelines Now in Effect

USA - January 10 2019 California Natural Resources Agency adopts final amendments to CEQA Guidelines, providing additional clarifying revisions to GHG impacts, baseline...

Samantha Seikkula, Marc T. Campopiano.

California Court of Appeal Rejects City’s MND in Historic District Due to Aesthetic and Traffic Impacts

USA - August 30 2018 In an opinion published on August 9, 2018, Protect Niles v. City of Fremont, Case No. A151645, the First Appellate District of the California Court of...

Lucas I. Quass, Christopher Adam Martinez.

California Court of Appeal Approves Environmental Analysis for Oil Refinery Propane Recovery Project

USA - May 4 2018 In a published opinion issued March 20, 2018, Rodeo Citizens v. County of Contra Costa, the California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's...

Lucas I. Quass, Derek Galey.

Proposed CEQA Guidelines Amendments Proceed Through Rulemaking Process

USA - February 27 2018 Proposed changes include shifting the methodology for studying projects’ potential traffic impacts and clarifying the terms for deferred mitigation...

Samantha Seikkula, Marc T. Campopiano.

California Supreme Court: CEQA Requires Study of Potential Impacts to ESHA

USA - April 4 2017 Lead agencies cannot ignore the Coastal Act's ESHA requirements in CEQA documents and defer analysis for later Coastal Commission review. Key Points:...

Lucas I. Quass, Samantha Seikkula, Jennifer K. Roy.