We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,373

Ontario Bill 154: Perfection by VIN
  • Miller Thomson LLP
  • Canada
  • September 19 2017

On September 14th Ontario Bill 154, Cutting Unnecessary Red Tape Act, 2017 passed first reading. The Bill has various Schedules with the names of


Can a "Non-Party" Director of a Corporation be held Personally Liable for litigation costs?
  • Torkin Manes LLP
  • Canada
  • September 14 2017

Where a corporation is a party to litigation, Courts will very rarely award the costs of the action against the non-party directors, shareholders or


Court of Appeal Significantly Reduces Judgment against Guarantor
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • September 14 2017

In Callidus Capital Corporation v. McFarlane, the Ontario Court of Appeal reduced the amount of debt a company's President and CEO owed on a guarantee


Does the Duty to Inform Apply Solely to the Contracting Parties?
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • September 5 2017

In Camions Daimler Canada ltée v. Camions Sterling de Lévis inc., 2017 QCCA 798, the Quebec Court of Appeal confirmed that the duty to inform that


Blaneys Ontario Court of Appeal Summaries
  • Blaney McMurtry LLP
  • Canada
  • September 1 2017

Good afternoon, Following are the summaries for this week’s civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario. Two of the three substantive decisions


Proven or presumed prejudice? The Quebec Court of Appeal clarifies the burden of proof under consumer protection law
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada
  • August 31 2017

Is a consumer plaintiff required to prove the actual prejudice suffered and its causal link with the alleged violation in order to obtain compensatory


Evidence of electronic contract requires demonstration of its integrity
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • August 30 2017

The Quebec Superior Court recently ruled on the level of evidence required to prove the existence of an electronic contract. In the case at hand, the


Ontario Court of Appeal Affirms Motherhood Contractual Interpretation Principles
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • August 29 2017

In RBC Dominion Securities Inc. v. Crew Gold Corporation ("Crew Gold"), the Ontario Court of Appeal reaffirmed a variety of fundamental contractual


“Buy now; pay later”: Leon’s Furniture ordered to pay moral and punitive damages
  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • Canada
  • August 28 2017

In June 2012, Option Consommateur was authorized by the Superior Court to institute a class action on behalf of any person having purchased goods or


Evidence of an electronic contract requires at the least a demonstration of its integrity
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • August 21 2017

The Superior Court of Québec recently ruled on the level of evidence required to prove the existence of an electronic contract. The plaintiff, M