We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 100

Brexit - Legal Implications
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • August 7 2017

In the memorandum below, we have briefly outlined some of the main legal implications of Brexit according to different models, including the EEA


Dutch Court Rules in Standard Essential Patent Abuse of Dominance Claim
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union, Netherlands
  • March 27 2017

The Hague District Court in the Netherlands rejected a claim brought by smartphone maker Archos alleging that Philips had abused its dominant


EU Court Confirms European Commission’s Decision on Pay-for-Delay Agreements
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • Denmark, European Union
  • October 20 2016

On 8 September 2016, the General Court of the European Union upheld the European Commission’s decision in which the antitrust regulator imposed fines


General Court of the EU Confirms Fines Imposed on Lundbeck and Generic Drug Manufacturers for Entering into Patent Settlements
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • September 22 2016

On 8 September 2016, the General Court of the EU (GCEU) handed down five judgments upholding a decision by the Commission of 19 June 2013 imposing


EU Court Rules That Royalties for Unpatented Technology Are Not Necessarily Anticompetitive
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • July 11 2016

On 7 July 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down a judgment on whether Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of


Paying Royalties for Technology that Competitors Can Use for Free - AG Wathelet’s Genentech Opinion
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • April 28 2016

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) recently issued its opinion on a question referred to it by the Paris Court of Appeal regarding the


CJEU rules on standard-essential patents, injunctions and abuse of dominance
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • September 9 2015

In its recent decision in Huawei v ZTE C 170130, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has set forth the legal test applicable to


The European Union’s highest court rules on standard-essential patents, injunctions and abuse of dominance
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • August 27 2015

The long-awaited ruling regarding the circumstances under which the owner of a standard-essential patent (SEP) encumbered by fair, reasonable and


The European Union’s highest court rules on standard-essential patents, injunctions and abuse of dominance
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union
  • July 23 2015

The long-awaited ruling on the seeking of injunctions in the context of standard-essential patents encumbered by fair, reasonable, and


The Advocate General of the EU clarifies position on enforcement of SEPs
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • European Union, Germany
  • December 30 2014

Despite the fact that standard-essential patents (SEPs) have been on the agenda of the European Union (EU) competition law debate for some time now