We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,425

Patent protection for medical uses and relevant judicial practice in China
  • Wanhuida Peksung
  • China
  • June 18 2014

The Supreme People's Court (hereinafter refers to as SPC) recently announced "2013 Top Ten Innovative Intellectual Property Cases of Chinese Court"


Eastern promise
  • Peksung Intellectual Property Ltd
  • China
  • March 25 2013

In China, if the validity of a patent is challenged in invalidation procedures, the patentee may amend the claims to make the patent immune to attack


Determination as to infringement of design patent right
  • MMLC Group
  • China
  • August 2 2013

The design patent in suit was the Design Patent No.ZL200530125566.9 “socket” that was filed with the SIPO on 10 October 2005 and registered on 1


Reward and remuneration for service inventions: Shanghai Higher People's Court issues guidelines following controversial China state IP Office's draft regulations last year
  • Hogan Lovells
  • China
  • August 1 2013

The draft Regulations on Service Inventions ("SIPO Draft") published by the China State Intellectual Property Office ("SIPO") in November last year


Arkema France wins the first instance of the patent invalidation administrative case
  • Liu, Shen & Associates
  • China
  • November 17 2014

On May 19, 2014, Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court entered a judgment to uphold the No. 19514 Decision on Invalidation (hereafter referred to


The Influence of ambiguity in claim on the patent infringement Wanqing Bai v. Shanghai Tianxiang Industrial Co., Ltd. et.al.(Article No. 6 from “China patent case review 2014” by Beijing East IP Ltd.)
  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • China
  • November 19 2014

Regarding problems raised under the condition that distinct defects existed in a claim make the protection scope of the claim unclear. For example


Importance of specification on claims interpretation Dongguan Jiachang Toys Co.,Ltd. et.al. v. Zhaoqing New Leader Battery Industry Co.,Ltd. et.al.(Article No. 5 from “China patent case review 2014” by Beijing East IP Ltd.)
  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • China
  • November 12 2014

When evaluating whether a claim has novelty andor inventiveness, the protection scope of the claim should be determined first. Article 56, Paragraph


Patent Evaluation Report and Legitimacy of Patent Right
  • Chofn Intellectual Property
  • China
  • November 10 2016

As provided in the current Chinese Patent Law, a patentee of a utility model patent or a design patent usually is required to furnish a patent


Decision of the Supreme People's Court on revising “Certain Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Hearing of Patent Dispute Cases” (Draft for Soliciting Public Opinion)
  • Beijing East IP Ltd
  • China
  • July 17 2014

On July 16, the Supreme People's Court published the Decision of the Supreme People's Court on Revising the "Certain Provisions of the Supreme


Patent infringement litigation awarded 37.2 million RMB
  • Liu, Shen & Associates
  • China
  • June 20 2014

On April 22, 2014, Weifang Intermediate People's Court served the first instance judgment for the utility model patent infringement litigation