We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 472

ArcelorMittal v. AK Steel Corporation, No. 2016-1357 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

District court retained subject matter jurisdiction for motion for summary judgment because the patentee's statements and "tacit acceptance" of


Asetek Danmark AS v. CMI USA Inc., Nos. 2016-1026, 2016-1183 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

A non-party must be sufficiently “legally identified” with the an enjoined party to be enjoined for conduct other than abetting a new violation


Phil-Insul Corp. v. Airlite Plastics Co., No. 2016-1982 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Rule 36 summary affirmance of district court judgment can have preclusive effect


Nichia Corporation v. Everlight Americas, Inc., Nos. 2016-1585 and 2016-1618 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 28, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Courts not required to grant injunction upon finding of infringement unless patentee proves all four equitable factors The patentee sued the alleged


Rembrandt Wireless v. Samsung Electronics, No. 2016-1729 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Licensee's failure to mark may limit a patent owner's recovery of pre-suit damages even for a disclaimed patent claim The patent owner sued alleging


In re: Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC, Nos. 2016-1092 and 2016-1172 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Evidence of commercial success must have a nexus to the claimed invention


Rivera v. ITC, No. 2016-1841 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Claims must find support in the specification, despite that they may be obvious in light of that specification


The Medicines Co. v. Mylan, Inc., Nos. 2015-1113, 2015-1151, and 2015-1181 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2017)
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2017

Federal Circuit interprets the term “batches” in patent claims to require a specific process of “efficient mixing” from specification


A Note of Appreciation to USPTO Director Michelle Lee
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • June 8 2017

On June 6th, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Michelle Lee, resigned


Supreme Court Holds That Patent Exhaustion Applies to All Sales, Foreign and Domestic
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2017

In yet another rebuke to the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court held yesterday in Impression Products v. Lexmark International that the doctrine