We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 139

Entire market value ruleR.I.P.?
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 28 2012

In an opinion that addresses the proper framework for evaluating reasonable royalty damages in the patent infringement context, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned a jury award of an $8.5 million lump sum and remanded the case for a new trial on damages


Federal Circuit upholds Commission's $11 million penalty on Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. for violating exclusion and cease and desist orders
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • February 16 2012

On February 8, 2012 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in the decision Ninestar Technology Co. v. International Trade Commission, affirmed the Commission's imposition of a penalty of over $11 million on Ninestar Technology Co., Ltd. (Ninestar) and two of its U.S. subsidiaries for their continued importation and sales of refurbished ink cartridges subject to exclusion and cease and desist orders


Commission declines review of ID terminating DC-DC Controller investigation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 9 2010

The Commission has determined not to review an initial determination terminating Investigation No. 337-TA-698, Certain DC-DC Controllers And Products Containing Same


Federal Circuit issues opinion in Pass & Seymour v. ITC
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 30 2010

On August 27, 2010 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the holding of the International Trade Commission in Inv. No. 337-TA-615, that certain accused products produced by Respondents General Protecht Group, Wenzhou Trimone Science and Technology Electric Co. Ltd. and Shanghai ELE Manufacturing Corporation do not infringe the asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 5,594,398 and 7,212,386, held by Complainant Pass & Seymour, Inc


ALJ Bullock denies summary determination motions in Inv. No. 337-TA-704
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 26 2010

ALJ Bullock issued two orders denying summary determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-704, Certain Mobile Communication Devices and Components Thereof


ALJ Rogers issues final ID finding no infringement in bulk welding wire investigation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 1 2010

On August 31, 2010, ALJ Rogers issued a lengthy Final Initial Determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-686, Certain Bulk Welding Wire Containers and Components Thereof and Welding Wire, finding that respondents ESAB AB of Sweden and Sidergas SpA of Italy do not infringe complainants Lincoln Electric Company and Lincoln Global, Inc.’s U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,864


Federal Circuit issues opinion in General Protecht Corp v. ITC
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 30 2010

On August 27, 2010, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion on the appeal from Inv. No. 337-TA-615, General Protecht Corp. v. ITC


En banc Federal Circuit affirms ITC decision on patent misuse
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 1 2010

On August 30, 2010, the en banc Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the ITC in Inv.No. 337-TA-474 (Princo Corp, et al. v. International Trade Commission, et al., Fed. Cir. 2007-1386


Commission modifies of initial determination and terminates investigation with finding of no violation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 16 2010

The Commission Opinion modifies ALJ Charneski's final initial determination ("ID") and finding of no violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) exists in Inv. No. 337-TA-680, In the Matter of Certain Machine Vision Software, Machine Vision Systems and Products Containing Same


Procedural schedule set in Inv. No. 337-TA-802
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 4 2011

ALJ Robert K. Rogers, Jr. issued an order on October 3, 2011 that sets the procedural schedule in Certain Light-Emitting Diodes Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-802