We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 78

What’s in Your Dispute Resolution Clause? Six Ways Dispute Resolution Clauses Impact Supply Chain Contracts
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • Global
  • June 27 2017

The dispute resolution clause doesn’t get much respect in many supply contracts. It is usually found close to the end, far beyond the point where the

Supreme Court of Western Australia decision on enforcement of Arbitral Award
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • Australia
  • December 20 2016

There have been relatively few recent developments in relation to the enforcement of arbitral awards in Australia. However, the Supreme Court of

Tire Company Can’t Compel Arbitration in China Under Expired Contract
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • December 2 2016

Yesterday, in Linglong Americas, Inc. v. Horizon Tire, Inc., a unanimous panel of the Sixth Circuit rejected a tire manufacturer’s attempt to compel

Dubai’s Public Private Partnership Law
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Arab Emirates
  • December 17 2015

Public Private Partnerships, or PPPs, are essentially partnerships between government and the independent private sector, pursuant to which delivery

One contract; three laws
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • June 28 2012

In the recent case of Sulamérica Cia Nacional de Seguros, S.A. and ors. v Enesa Engenharia, S.A. and ors. 2012 EWCA Civ 638, the English Court of Appeal has provided useful clarification regarding a tricky, but not uncommon, issue arising in relation to international contracts: namely, the interrelationship between the different systems of law governing different parts of a contract and its effect on the parties chosen method(s) for resolving disputes

Courts required to assess of their own motion whether terms fair under UTCCR 1999
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • European Union, Spain, United Kingdom
  • October 29 2009

In a reference from the Spanish courts in the case of Asturcom Telecomunicaciones SL v Maria Cristina Rodriguez Nogueira, the ECJ has considered whether, in proceedings involving a term in a consumer contract, a national court must consider of its own motion whether that term is unfair within the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Directive (9313EEC) (the Directive

Abitration to set aside company’s resolutions
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • Spain
  • July 3 2008

In this decision, the Spanish Supreme Court studies the submission to arbitration of the appeal against corporate agreements, performing a comprehensive analysis of the existing doctrine regarding a heteronomous method for solving controversies together with the imperative regulation that governs appeals against the agreements adopted by the General Shareholders Meeting of a Limited Corporation

Frank M. Placenti
  • Squire Patton Boggs

Jesus Carrasco
  • Squire Patton Boggs