We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 624

Defendant Precluded from Using Expert’s Deposition After Terminating Relationship with Expert
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 27 2017

Greatbatch moved in limine to preclude the defendant, AVX, from presenting the testimony of AVX’s expert, Dr. Panlener, by deposition. The district


The Impact of TC Heartland: Motion to Challenge Venue Waived Where Defendant Failed to Bring Motion with Other Rule 12(b) Motion
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • July 13 2017

After this patent infringement action was filed, the defendant, BigCommerce, filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for relief


District Court Orders Search of Inventors Emails and Finds That Discovery Is Proportional to Needs of Case Because Search Terms Would Be Used
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 26 2017

In this patent infringement action, T-Mobile sought email discovery from seventeen named inventors of the asserted patents and the licensing


Unwired v. Apple: District Court Sanctions Unwired for Failing to Produce Supplemental Information after Remand
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 19 2017

During this patent infringement action, Apple filed a motion for discovery sanctions based on a failure to produce documents after a remand. The


District Court Granted Voluntary Motion to Dismiss Against Named Defendant But Disallowed Reservation of Rights as to Unnamed Third Parties
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 17 2017

In this patent infringement action, Plaintiff Wright's Well Control Services, LLC (WWCS) filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss defendant Christopher


District Court Denies Motion for Exceptional Case and for Attorney's Fees after Trial
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • April 5 2017

After the defendants Ingenico S.A.'s, Ingenico Corp.'s, and Ingenico Inc.'s (the "Ingenico Defendants") prevailed at trial, the defendants filed a


District Court Precludes New Substitute Witness for Failure to Timely Disclose
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • March 2 2017

As trial approached in this patent infringement action, the plaintiff, 511 Innovations, Inc., filed a motion to exclude a witness at trial, Tim Benner


District Court Denies Request to Change Expert Date Based on Change in Defense Counsel
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 21 2017

Plaintiff Genes Industry, Inc. ("Genes") filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Custom Blinds and Components, Inc. ("Custom"). The


District Court Stays Case Pending Inter Partes Review After Non-Petitioning Defendant Agrees to be Bound by Estoppel Provisions
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 14 2017

In a previous order, the district court granted a motion to stay pending Inter Partes Review ("IPR") but deferred ruling on the Motion to Stay with


District Court Excludes Damage Expert for Failure to Apportion But Gives Expert One More Opportunity to Supplement Report
  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • USA
  • February 7 2017

In this patent infringement action, Plaid sought to exclude the entirety of the plaintiff's damage expert's, Robinson's, reasonable royalty analysis