We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 16,728

Wisconsin’s controversial public union law upheld as constitutional
  • Sherman & Howard LLC
  • USA
  • March 5 2013

A panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld Wisconsin's widely-discussed 2011 law that limits the collective bargaining rights of

Under the Fourth Amendment, can a particular “search” be lawful, but an accompanying seizure be unlawful? The Supreme Court says “yes” and explains how in Bailey v. United States of America
  • Duane Morris LLP
  • USA
  • February 25 2013

The Fourth Amendment sets forth every citizen's right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. The two active verbs in the Amendment (i.e

East Timor institutes proceedings against Australia in relation to documents seized from office of Australian lawyer
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • Australia
  • December 24 2013

On 17 December 2013, East Timor instituted proceedings against Australia in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in relation to documents seized

What are “private” vs “public” interests under DC anti-SLAPP statute?
  • LeClairRyan
  • USA
  • February 26 2013

We should get more insight into the answer to that question after the DC Superior Court rules in the pending case of Campbell v. CGI Group, Inc

Supreme Court to determine whether agencies must undergo notice and comment prior to changing an interpretation
  • Bracewell LLP
  • USA
  • June 16 2014

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could have far-ranging implications for agency proclamations that impact the business community. On

Court of Appeal affirms Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's finding of fact that correctional officer driving home after second shift was not on special mission
  • Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
  • USA
  • June 10 2014

Lieutenant Seth Patrick Lantz worked as a correctional officer at the Pleasant Valley State Prison in Coalinga. Because Lantz lived in the

California Court of Appeal affirms dismissal of retaliation claims based on failure to exhaust remedies
  • Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
  • USA
  • June 10 2014

In a case handled by Mark Meyerhoff and Connie Almond of our Los Angeles office, the California Court of Appeal, in an unpublished decision, affirmed

Illinois plaintiffs fail to assert recognizable violation of constitutional rights in challenging school district’s support for property tax referendum, 1983 claim dismissed
  • Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
  • USA
  • January 6 2014

In Peraica v. Riverside-Brookfield High School District No. 208 (Oct. 31, 2013), Plaintiffs alleged that the school district improperly advocated

U.S. Supreme Court denies foreign sovereigns special protection from post-judgment discovery
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • Argentina, USA
  • June 18 2014

On June 16, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., which could lead to more prolific post-judgment

Supreme Court rules on Argentina’s two petitions
  • Perkins Coie LLP
  • Argentina, USA
  • June 18 2014

On June 16, 2014, in the litigation of NML Capital, Ltd. et al., v The Republic of Argentina, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear