We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 101

Brussels Regulation Recast: what’s changed?
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • European Union
  • March 12 2015

The Recast Brussels Regulation (EU 12152012) came into force on 10 January 2015. It has been designed to remedy some of the perceived defects in its


A new kid on the block? Stretching "Teckal" to ‘horizontal in-house transactions’?
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • European Union
  • June 2 2014

The European Court of Justice has recently been asked to consider whether the Teckal exemption for in-house contracts should also exempt so called


Obese workers are not necessarily disabled
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • European Union
  • December 18 2014

The European Court of Justice has this morning published its decision in the Danish obesity reference. As widely expected it has confirmed that


Advocate General’s opinion endorses traditional approach to collective redundancies
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • European Union
  • February 5 2015

The Advocate General's opinion published this morning endorses the orthodox understanding of the trigger point for the obligation to consult


UK proposals for reform of the European Court of Human Rights
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • April 16 2012

Representatives from the Council of Europe will be attending a conference in Brighton on 18-20 April to discuss the future of the ECHR


Can CVs be evaluated at award stage?
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • European Union
  • January 28 2013

European Dynamics have continued to keep the European Courts busy. In a recent skirmish (Case T-44710 European Dynamics v Court of Justice of the


Patient matters children - ECHR ruling on removal of child from parents in suspected abuse case
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • June 14 2010

The case of M.A.K. and R.K. v the United Kingdom related to incidents from 1997-98


Crocked!
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • European Union
  • August 12 2010

The decision of the OHIM Board of Appeal in Crocs, Inc v Holey Soles Holdings Ltd, Case R 92008-3, emphasises that the successful launch of a design outside the EU (particularly in a country such as the USA) can invalidate any subsequent Community design


Service charges a separate supply for VAT purposes?
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • January 28 2010

A recent decision of the European Court of Justice has cast doubt on HMRC's long held view that service charges relating to common areas follow the VAT treatment of the services supplies under a lease


Can Article 6 be used to promote substantive legal rights across Europe?
  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • European Union
  • March 10 2015

On the face of it last month's Court of Appeal decision in the Benkharbouchecase is about a relatively obscure corner of UK employment law: the