We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 803

Travelers Fails to Pull a Rabbit out of its Hat and Must Defend its Insured
  • Nossaman LLP
  • USA
  • August 16 2017

In a recent federal court decision out of Colorado, Travelers failed to convince the Court that it had no duty to defend its insured based on its IP


Is Recent Legislation a Prediction of Statutory Dram Shop Liability?
  • Nexsen Pruet
  • USA
  • July 3 2017

There is no question; drunk drivers are a danger to everyone on the road - including themselves. Recognizing that, many states have enacted dram shop


A Cyber Coverage Warning for Hospitality Insureds
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • April 4 2017

On March 27, 2017, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. (St. Paul) filed suit against its insured, a subsidiary of the Rosen Hotels and Resorts of


In Times Like These, Foo Fighters Learn to Litigate Again
  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • USA
  • June 17 2016

This week, rock band Foo Fighters sued certain Lloyd's market insurers for failure to pay under two policies - a Cancellation Policy and a Terrorism


Fourth Circuit holds that a Virginia hunt club’s CGL policy did not cover club members for personal recreational activities
  • Phelps Dunbar LLP
  • USA
  • August 11 2015

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that a CGL policy did not cover a club member's liability for unintentionally shooting another


Whose case is it, anyway?
  • Anderson Kill PC
  • USA
  • March 31 2015

Every year, hotels are subject to a host of lawsuits, both valid and meritless, from guests who claim to have suffered on-premises injury. The


U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals holds that liquor liability exclusion applies to claim against racetrack owner
  • Phelps Dunbar LLP
  • USA
  • August 4 2014

The U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has held that an insurer had no obligation under Kentucky law to defend or indemnify a racetrack owner


11th Circuit holds E&O insurer has duty to defend legionalla claim
  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • USA
  • March 12 2014

In its recent decision in James River Ins. Co. v. Hufsey-Nicolaides-Garcia-Suarez Associates, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4415 (11th Cir. Mar. 10, 2014


California limits workers' compensation claims by professional athletes, including former NFL players with concussion-related injuries
  • Hogan Lovells
  • USA
  • October 11 2013

Following news of the NFL concussion litigation settlement, the NFL and other professional leaguesteams as well their insurers just


Battery exclusion prevents coverage for exotic dancer set on fire by customer
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • October 2 2013

Why it matters: An exotic dancer was the victim of a terrible crime perpetrated by a spurned applicant for a job as an exotic dancer. The victim sued