We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,694

Insuring Fine Art: The Visual Artists Rights Act and Its Bad Faith Implications
  • Cozen O'Connor
  • USA
  • November 15 2016

Insuring fine art can present challenges that are not encountered with other types of property. One of these challenges involves the application of

FINRA to Overhaul Gifts, Non-Cash Compensation, and Business Entertainment Rules
  • Carlton Fields
  • USA
  • October 13 2016

On August 5, FINRA proposed amendments to its gifts rule (Rule 3220) along with new rules to replace the current provisions governing noncash

California Supreme Court overrules prior appellate decision on coverage for product disparagement
  • Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
  • USA
  • July 9 2014

In Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Swift Distribution, Inc., the California Supreme Court clarified the law on coverage for commercial

California Supreme Court defines scope of advertising injury coverage
  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2014

Hartford v. Swift imposes "specificity" requirements that may provide comfort to companies facing disparagement claims while requiring careful

California DAs Forgive but Don’t Forget Liberty Mutual’s False Advertising
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • November 10 2016

To settle false advertising charges brought by three California District Attorneys, Liberty Mutual will pay almost $1 million and stop promoting an

New mandatory exclusions in standard CGL policies limit coverage for data breaches
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • July 30 2014

The insurance industry continues to respond to the growing threat of data breaches by directing businesses facing that risk towards new

Insurance Co. seeks declaration to avoid possible “all natural” putative class action payout
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2014

Months after a Florida federal court rejected a motion to dismiss a putative class action alleging that Bodacious Foods falsely labeled its cookies

Coverage for false ad suit precluded by breach of contract exclusion
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • July 2 2015

A breach of contract policy exclusion precludes coverage for a cross-claim against a policyholder alleging fraud and breach of contract, according to

Eighth Circuit holds that intentional injury exclusion relieved insurer from defending insured against defamation claims
  • Steptoe & Johnson LLP
  • USA
  • April 1 2015

In Sletten & Brettin Orthodontics, LLC v. Continental Casualty Company, 2015 WL 1260024 (8th Cir. March 19, 2015), the US Court of Appeals for the

Recent decision determines retail displays may qualify as ‘advertisements’ under CGL insurance policies
  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • USA
  • March 20 2015

A recent decision interpreting insurance coverage for "advertising injury" under commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policies ruled that