We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 34

Generic Health succeeds in invalidating patent for aripiprazole: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd v Generic Health Pty Ltd (No 4) 2015 FCA 634
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • July 7 2015

Generic Health is perhaps a step closer to bringing its generic version of the antipsychotic drug aripiprazole to market in Australia after Justice


Privacy Commissioner’s decision set aside by the Federal Court
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • March 16 2015

A recent decision by Federal Court of Australia illustrated two things about privacy complaints - or at least those that end up before the courts:


Australian court decides important gene patenting question isolated genetic material patentable subject matter
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • February 15 2013

Earlier today, the Federal Court rejected a claim brought by Cancer Voices Australia that isolated genetic material (DNA or RNA) that is naturally


Homeopathy plus! Not immune from the ACL
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • March 7 2013

On 21 February 2013, the ACCC instituted proceedings against Homeopathy Plus! Australia Pty Ltd ("Homeopathy Plus!") in the Federal Court of


High Court states the obvious: AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd appeal decided
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • September 3 2015

In a widely anticipated decision, the High Court has upheld a decision of the Full Federal Court (which was made by five, rather than the usual three


Experimental evidence comply with the rules or risk inadmissibility
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • March 22 2013

By refusing to allow Generic Health to adduce experimental evidence in a patent case currently being heard in the Federal Court, Justice Jagot has


FWC supports employer’s right to nominate doctor
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • July 8 2014

The Fair Work Commission has ruled that an employer was entitled to require one of its employees to attend an appointment with a general practitioner


The image of deception
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • March 14 2014

On 10 March 2014, the Federal Court of Australia found that Breast Check Pty Ltd engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and made false


De-identification and medical records in NSW
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • October 24 2014

Are health service providers in New South Wales obliged by the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 (NSW) to de-identify medical records


Just genes? Lessons from the Myriad litigation
  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • Australia
  • August 19 2013

Last month the United States Supreme Court ruled that certain naturally occurring DNA sequences (the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, mutations in which are