We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type



21 results found


Seyfarth Shaw LLP | USA | 24 May 2018

Dismissal Denied In EEOC Race Discrimination Action Against Security Company

A federal district court in Maryland recently denied in part an employer’s motion to dismiss a race discrimination action brought


Seyfarth Shaw LLP | USA | 20 Jul 2016

End of The Employment Road? Tips To Avoid a Collision

Inevitably, at some point, every employment relationship comes to an end. For many people, where they work and what they do is a source of pride and


Seyfarth Shaw LLP | USA | 25 Oct 2010

Public sector employers must beware of non-discrimination testing on their insured health care plans

Some public sector employers provide different health insurance benefits or charge certain employees less for insurance.


Seyfarth Shaw LLP | USA | 22 Sep 2009

Employees must arbitrate discrimination claims only if arbitration agreement states clear intention

In Warfield v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc., the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) held that an employment contract purporting to waive or limit an employee’s rights under the Massachusetts anti-discrimination statute is enforceable only if the intent to do so is stated in “clear and unmistakable terms.”

Previous page 1 2 3