39 results found
Squire Patton Boggs | USA | 26 Jun 2017
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: Public Employers with Less Than 20 Employees Are Covered By The ADEA
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) prohibits covered employers from discriminating against employees and applicants who are age 40 or
Squire Patton Boggs | United Kingdom | 30 May 2017
Age discrimination - the great pensions imponderable!
Age discrimination is a notoriously difficult area to address in the context of pension plans (which, by their very nature, provide benefits by
Squire Patton Boggs | USA | 4 Apr 2017
Supreme Court Says Appellate Courts Must Defer To District Court Decisions Regarding Enforceability of EEOC Subpoenas
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) bestows upon the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) the right to subpoena records
Squire Patton Boggs | United Kingdom | 26 Mar 2012
Can cost considerations alone justify age discrimination?
The answer is still no, according to the Court of Appeal, but the good news is that they can still be taken into account.
Squire Patton Boggs | USA | 19 Mar 2012
Proposed legislation seeks to ease plaintiffs burden in federal age discrimination claims
A bipartisan group of three United States Senators recently introduced legislation designed to overturn the United States Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Gross v. FBL Financial, Inc.
Squire Patton Boggs | United Kingdom | 27 Oct 2011
Age of uncertainty - revisions to retirement rules?
More hot news from the Department of Cheap Political Gestures earlier this week.
Squire Patton Boggs | France | 13 Sep 2011
Compulsory retirement risk for French employers
Is compulsory retirement still lawful?
Squire Patton Boggs | United Kingdom | 20 Jan 2011
It looks increasingly unlikely that the "dual discrimination" provisions set out in the Equality Act 2010 will be coming into force this April.
Squire Patton Boggs | United Kingdom | 3 Aug 2010
Default retirement age through the looking glass
Regulation 30 of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 allows an employer to retire an employee compulsorily at age 65 without that employee having any of the usual age discrimination or unfair dismissal protections.
Squire Patton Boggs | Germany | 14 Jun 2010
Age discrimination and redundancy
Earlier this year the German Federal Employment Court ruled on the issue of age discrimination in respect of redundancies (Case 6 AZR 91108).