We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type



5 results found


Baker & Hostetler LLP | USA | 24 May 2016

Ohio Employment Law Reform: S.B. 268

The Ohio General Assembly heard testimony on May 18, 2016, in support of pending Senate Bill 268 (S.B. 268), the Employment Law Uniformity Act. S.B


Baker & Hostetler LLP | USA | 22 Jun 2009

Supreme Court holds that ADEA plaintiffs alleging disparate treatment must prove that their employer acted because of age, clarifying that employers motivated only in part by age are not liable for discrimination

The U.S. Supreme Court held on June 18, 2009, that plaintiffs alleging intentional age discrimination must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that age was the "but-for" cause of the challenged adverse employment action.


Baker & Hostetler LLP | USA | 8 Jun 2009

Age discrimination claims under Ohio law may be barred by internal grievance process

On June 2, 2009, the Ohio Supreme Court held that an age discrimination claim filed by a former employee of United Parcel Systems ("UPS") was barred because an earlier internal "arbitration" proceeding found that the employee had been terminated for just cause.

Previous page 1 Next page