We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type


Firm name


397 results found


Foley & Lardner LLP | USA | 29 Jul 2016

Wisconsin Court of Appeals Issues Reminder of Power of Federal Arbitration Act

In the last generation, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly promoted the policy under federal law in favor of arbitrating claims, including in the


Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | United Kingdom | 7 Jul 2011

Agency workers their rights, your duty

Agency workers, also known as 'temps', are relied upon by many businesses, with an estimated 1.3 million on assignment in the UK at any given time.


Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP | United Kingdom | 11 Mar 2010

Agency worker not protected from discrimination

In a case highlighting a gap in discrimination legislation, the Court of Appeal has held that a temporary agency worker could not pursue discrimination claims against either the end user client for whom he performed work or the agency that supplied him (Muschett v HM Prison Service).


Day Pitney LLP | USA | 12 Oct 2007

Parties must diligently pursue discovery under Rule 56(f)

When opposing summary judgment, particularly in the early stages of a case or before discovery is complete, attorneys should keep in mind the range of tools at their disposal including Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f), which provides for a continuance to conduct additional discovery.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...