We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

Territory

22 results found

Article

Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Canada | 14 Jul 2017

Division continues amongst Canadian securities regulators regarding best interest standard

Amid division across the Canadian securities regulators, the Ontario Securities Commission appears determined to move forward with a best interest

Article

Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Canada | 28 Oct 2016

Contested private placements under the new take-over bid regime: the Dolly Varden decision

In a significant decision, the British Columbia and Ontario securities commissions have upheld a contested private placement by the target of an

Article

Stikeman Elliott LLP | Canada | 20 Jun 2013

OSC to host panel discussion on statutory best duty

It was announced last week that the Ontario Securities Commission will be hosting a panel discussion on the potential imposition of a statutory

Article

Blaney McMurtry LLP | Canada | 9 Nov 2011

Pill-popping: hostile takeovers and securities regulation in Ontario

Securities regulation in Canada, with its 13 different securities jurisdictions, is sometimes politely referred to as a “mosaic”.

Article

McCarthy Tétrault LLP | Canada | 14 Oct 2011

The clash of the rights plan cases (redux)

The Ontario Securities Commission issued an order this week in connection with a shareholder rights plan adopted by the board of directors of MOSAID Technologies Incorporated in response to a hostile bid made by Wi-LAN Inc.

Article

McCarthy Tétrault LLP | Canada | 1 Mar 2011

OSC provides guidance on use of rights plans: Baffinland

Recent decisions of the Ontario Securities Commission and the British Columbia Securities Commission have led to some debate about the ability of a target board of directors to effectively use a shareholder rights plan to fend off a bidder in a hostile takeover bid.

Article

Stikeman Elliott LLP | Canada | 25 Jan 2011

Let courts rule on poison pills

The current Baffinland Iron Mines Corp. control contest, in which the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) has intervened several times, raises yet again questions about the fundamental differences between securities regulation and corporate law.

Article

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | 17 Jan 2011

The Ontario Securities Commission rejects deference to target boards in poison pill decisions

The Ontario Securities Commission's reasons in Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation clearly rejected the proposition that securities commissions should defer to the business judgment of a target board of directors in deciding whether to cease trade a shareholder rights plan (also known as a poison pill).

Article

Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Canada | 13 Jan 2011

The role of litigation in M&A tactics and strategy - greater than ever

New situations as well as differences in viewpoints among provincial securities commissions, and between the commissions and the courts, will continue to shape the framework in which M&A transactions take place.

Article

Miller Thomson LLP | Canada | 15 Nov 2010

New directions in Canadian rights plans but which way?

On July 27, 2010, the British Columbia Securities Commission (“BCSC”) issued its full majority reasons for its April 2010 decision to cease-trade the Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. shareholder rights plan (the “SRP”) adopted in response to a hostile bid made by a group of companies led by Carl Icahn.

Previous page 1 2 3