We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,348

The inadvertent fiduciary: Mass Mutual crosses the line
  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • June 16 2014

Plan fiduciaries are held to the highest performance standards and can be personally liable for breaches of fiduciary responsibility. Because of this


Crowell & Moring's Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
  • Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • May 17 2017

Each week, Crowell & Moring's Advertising & Product Risk Management Group brings you the top stories in retail and consumer products law. Our recent


Deemed reliance in the U.S. Supreme Court
  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • July 14 2014

On June 23, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund ("Halliburton"), as


Internet sales tax update
  • Field Law
  • Canada, USA
  • December 6 2013

We recently reported on a case out of New York State, which dealt with the question of sales tax liability in the case of online sales. That decision


Attention internet publishers: linking limits libel liability
  • Thompson Coburn LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • November 20 2013

When the Internet was young, and the thrills of hypertext linking were still new, hyperlinks were viewed as a potential source of liability. I


PTAB allows second deposition of declarant where party submitted declaration with one paper and then used the declaration in a different context to support an argument in another, later-filed paper
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • November 14 2013

There has been some gamesmanship in the use of declarations submitted in connection with various papers in post-issuance trials. Under the Rules, a


How "reasonable" is the "reasonable consumer"? Differing American and Canadian perspectives
  • Venable LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • February 26 2013

Last year, the Supreme Court of Canada's much-anticipated Richard decision signaled a shift in Canadian consumer protection law and a rejection of


Patents and Canadian competition laws
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada, USA
  • April 22 2013

In Canada, the Competition Act largely defers to the Patent Act. For example, the Act's abuse of dominance provision (s. 79 Canada's


Limelight v Akamai and indirect patent infringement in Canada
  • Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
  • Canada, USA
  • August 13 2014

Recently, in Limelight Networks Inc v Akamai Technologies Inc et al ("Akamai"), 134 S Ct 2111 (2014), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that one cannot be


MacDermid, Inc. v. Deiter, 702 F.3d 725 (2d Cir. 2012)
  • Baker McKenzie
  • Canada, USA
  • March 25 2013

Plaintiff MacDermid Chemicals ("MacDermid"), a Connecticut company, decided to terminate the employment of Defendant Jackie Deiter, who worked and