We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 563

Penaltyunfair deduction from wages - is recouping recruitment expenses allowed?
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • December 5 2013

In Cleeve Link v Bryla, the Claimant signed an employment contract agreeing that, if within the first six months, she was dismissed for misconduct or


TUPE - does not apply to provision of services for ‘single specific event’
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • December 5 2013

In Swanbridge Hire & Sales v Butler (UKEAT005613), the Respondents (Butler and colleagues) were employed by a contractor, Kitsons, on a project to


Ashurst Rowan Financial Planning v Hall: ‘garden leave’ clause; interaction with restrictive covenant
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • June 21 2013

Ashurst Rowan Financial Planning v Hall concerned an employee whose employment contract contained a clause allowing the employer, during his 6 month


Uber - a 'fare' deal?
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • November 7 2016

On 28 October 2016 the Employment Tribunal ruled in favour of two Uber drivers seeking to establish their status as 'workers' as the first of a number


Court of Appeal decides that statutory holiday pay must include the contractual results-based commission.
  • Bird & Bird
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • November 14 2016

This is an important case in the evolving field of holiday pay and variable remuneration. The Court of Appeal confirmed the Employment Appeal


Employers must give clear consideration to amend restrictive covenants.
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • November 14 2016

This case highlights the importance of providing consideration to employees when introducing or amending post-termination restrictive covenants once


How narrow should 'activities' be interupted in TUPE transfers?
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • November 14 2016

Coventry City Council provided a range of services to homeless people through contracts with numerous providers. The claimants were employed by a


Employee's duty of fidelity while on garden leave
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • January 15 2013

In Imam-Sadeque v Bluebay Asset Management (Services) Ltd the claimant was a senior employee who wanted to leave his employer and negotiated terms on


Is the client the same? An important consideration for TUPE transfers
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • October 14 2016

This case highlights the need for continuity of "the client" to trigger a TUPE transfer in the context of a change in service provider. CT Plus Ltd


Disabled employee entitled to the same salary when moved to a lesser role
  • Bird & Bird
  • United Kingdom
  • October 14 2016

This case confirmed that an employer's duty to make reasonable adjustments for a disabled employee can be extended to continuing to pay a higher