We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 383

Asia Employment Law Horizon-Scanning - 2017 The Changing Face of the Employment Relationship
  • Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
  • Australia, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, China, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore
  • January 26 2017

Changes in the way we access goods and services, with a continuing focus on the use of technology, were a key feature of 2016

비자명성(Non-Obviousness)에 의한 거절이유가 2 부족할 때
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • South Korea, USA
  • October 4 2016

미국 특허법에서 35 U.S.C. 103은 특허를 받는 기술이 종래의 기술에 비추어 보았을 때 해당 분야의 통상의 기술을 가진 자에게 자명(obvious)하지 않을 것을 요구합니다. 이것은 세상에 이미 알려진 바와 비교했을 때 너무 “뻔한” 기술한테는 특허라는

특허적격성 판단에 있어 발명의 선취(preemption) 여부의 중요성
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • South Korea, USA
  • September 27 2016

소프트웨어 발명의 특허적격성을 인정한 또 하나의 연방순회항소법원(CAFC) 판결 (McRo v. Bandai Namco Games America)이 2016년 9월 13일에 내려졌습니다. 연방순회항소법원은 지방법원의 판결을 뒤집고 3D 애니메이션 기술에 관한

Women in law shattering ceilings,Achieving work-life balance,getting to the top and more
  • SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan
  • China, Global, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, Middle East, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea
  • August 11 2016

Background checks help organizations understand who they are really doing business with. Thomson Reuters Enhanced Due Diligence Reports deliver a

Key provision of Korean Industrial Technology Protection Act declared unconstitutional
  • Shin & Kim
  • South Korea
  • October 25 2013

Korean Constitutional Court ruled that a key provision of the Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology (as established

Penalty provision for the “act of obtaining industrial technology through unlawful methods” found unconstitutional
  • Yoon & Yang LLC
  • South Korea
  • October 25 2013

In July 2013, the Constitutional Court held that Article 36(2) of the former Act on Prevention and Protection of Industrial Technology (hereinafter

South Korea Court opens the door for unintentional data breach collective actions abroad
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • South Korea
  • March 1 2013

On February 15, 2013, the Seoul Western District Court in South Korea issued a judgment in a collective consumer action against a South Korean

On December 27, 2012, the Supreme Court suggested criteria for recognition of damages resulting from personal information leakage
  • Yulchon LLC
  • South Korea
  • February 18 2013

GS Caltex Corporation recently prevaield in a landmark Supreme Court group action seeking compensation for damages incurred to bonus card members

Online service provider's liability for turning over user's personal information to law enforcement authority
  • Lee & Ko
  • South Korea
  • January 31 2013

On October 18, 2012, the Seoul High Court reversed a trial court's decision, by ruling that NHN, the largest online service provider ("OSP"

Constitutional Court holds that "Online Real-Name Rules" are unconstitutional
  • Yoon & Yang LLC
  • South Korea
  • September 4 2012

The Constitutional Court of Korea unanimously held that the so-called "Online Real-Name Rules," as set forth under Article 44(5), Section 1(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (the "Act") and Articles 29 and 30(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Act, which requires an information service provider that operates an Internet forum to verify the user's real name prior to granting such user access to its Internet forum, are unconstitutional because such rules violate the Internet forum user's freedom of expression and the right to such user's discretion regarding hisher personal information as well as the information service provider's freedom of press