We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 141

Fiduciary duties of financial advisors
  • Piper Alderman
  • Australia
  • November 8 2012

Although it is hard to understand how this view could have arisen, there was a view amongst some members of the financial planning industry that financial planners did not owe fiduciary duties to their clients


Licensing requirement net tangible assets deferred tax assets included
  • Piper Alderman
  • Australia
  • October 5 2010

In a recent case, the AAT overruled a decision of ASIC cancelling the Australian financial services licence (AFSL) of a responsible entity (RE) that was the operator of a number of property trusts


Have you duly undertaken due diligence?
  • Piper Alderman
  • Australia, New Zealand
  • October 31 2014

A recent decision in the High Court of New Zealand, Houghton v Saunders 2014 NZHC 2229 , may provide helpful guidance to directors of Australian


Shares: an instrument of crime?
  • Piper Alderman
  • Australia
  • April 4 2014

Eleven years ago money laundering offences in the Commonwealth Criminal Code were expanded to include dealing with money or property with an


Financial product risk disclosure including for wholesale clients
  • Piper Alderman
  • Australia
  • February 22 2013

Some important principles concerning risk disclosure arise out of the recent decisions in the Federal Court of Wingecarribee Shire Council v Lehman


Managing your risks under global anti-corruption regimes
  • Piper Alderman
  • Australia, United Kingdom, USA
  • September 13 2012

Pharmaceutical and medical device companies operate in a stringent regulatory environment


ASIC v Fortescue Metals Group Ltd: a timely warning about corporate disclosure and misleading conduct
  • Piper Alderman
  • Australia
  • March 17 2011

Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) appealed because the case raised important issues concerning:A listed entity's obligations to disclose information under the continuous disclosure provisions of the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) Listing Rules and the Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth) (Act


ACCC v Metcash Trading Limited ACCC appeals but the deal goes on
  • Piper Alderman
  • Australia
  • September 30 2011

On 25 August 2011 His Honour Justice Emmett delivered a judgment in favour of Interfrank Group Holdings Pty Ltd (Franklins), permitting the acquisition by Metcash Trading Limited (Metcash) of all the shares in Franklins


Risky business prevails in first case on enhanced disclosure securities
  • Piper Alderman
  • Australia
  • February 7 2012

Group proceedings were commenced on behalf of investors in the Timbercorp Group, a leading agribusiness company that had been placed into voluntary administration


Corporate disclosure and directors’ and officers’ duties
  • Piper Alderman
  • Australia
  • June 7 2011

The Full Federal Court and the New South Wales Court of Appeal have recently handed down judgements in appeals in the 'Fortescue Metals' and 'James Hardie' proceedings brought by the ASIC in relation to misleading company announcements to the ASX