We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 11-20 of 195

California requires many foreign corporations to send annual financial statements to shareholders
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • May 13 2013

California is a net exporter of corporate charters, but it remains home to many corporations. As a result, the California Corporations Code has a


No directors, no officers, no employees and no agents now what?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • May 3 2013

Occasionally, a corporation may find itself with no directors and no management. Yet, the corporation does not cease to exist. One might wonder what


An exemption for foreign subsidiary formation
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • May 6 2013

The formation of a subsidiary under the laws of a foreign country may not seem to implicate the California Corporate Securities Law. Yet, an offer


Legislature acts to forestall business filings Götterdämmerung
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • May 9 2013

Anyone who has submitted a business filing to the California Secretary of State's office know that a serious problem exists. At present, the


Those who hold themselves apart seem to be getting all the attention
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • June 10 2014

Who knew that abstentions were so newsworthy? Here are three recent news stories involving abstentions at annual meetings: Warren Buffett Defends


Nevada legislature considers bill to authorize forum selection charter provisions
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • April 4 2013

Late last month, the Nevada Committee on Judiciary introduced a bill that would, among numerous other things, authorize forum selection provisions in


Why incorporation may be unconstitutional
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • April 29 2013

Section 25018 of the California Corporations Code provides a definition of several of the better known federal securities laws: "Securities Act of


“Wherever you go, there you are”, but will you be in the proper county?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • December 18 2013

The California General Corporation Law makes numerous references to the "proper county". For example, Corporations Code Section 304 empowers the


Where exactly is it written that shareholders aren’t liable for corporate debts?
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • November 8 2013

Recently, UCLA Law School Professor Stephen Bainbridge took notice of Section 6.22(b) of the Model Business Corporation Act and asked what might lead


SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee pushes for oddly named “universal proxy ballots”
  • Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
  • USA
  • August 13 2013

In late July, the SEC's Investor Advisory Committee issued a recommendation that the SEC "explore relaxing the 'bona fide nominee' rule embodied in