We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 44

4 Steps To Avoid 'Bet-The-Company' Trade Secret Litigation
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • June 5 2017

It’s every inside counsel’s nightmare: realizing that the new piece of litigation that has just landed on their desk has the potential to cripple the


Don’t “Hire” A Lawsuit: A New Employee’s Misappropriation of Trade Secrets May Quickly Become Your Own
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • May 23 2017

Companies commonly assume that they will only be sued for trade secret misappropriation if they or someone from their company steal the "secret


A Key Difference Between the DTSA and UTSA: “Continued Misappropriation” Continues to be a Viable Claim
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • April 3 2017

The Defend Trade Secrets Act ("DTSA"), unapologetically, was modeled after the Uniform Trade Secrets Act ("UTSA") in many respects. For background


Texas' Secret Weapon To Keep Ex-Employees Honest
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • February 21 2017

Texas employers may be missing out on a little-known strategy that can prove highly effective when dealing with noncompete and trade secret disputes


Securing An Ex Parte Seizure Remedy Under DTSA
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • February 17 2017

Last year, a new federal statute was passed that should have a profound effect on employers and their businesses the Defend Trade Secret Act. The


Federal Court in California Rules on DTSA’s “Extraordinary” Ex Parte Seizure Remedy
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • January 11 2017

When the Defend Trade Secret Act (“DTSA”) was enacted last year, there was much debate on the remedy provision permitting the ex parte seizure of


Choice of Forum and the Parties Matter in Med Device Cases (Particularly in Minnesota)!
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • January 9 2017

The medical device industry has seen a litigation boom in recent years in non-compete litigation. A new case out of the District of Minnesota


Colorado Supreme Court Ruling May Result in Disclosure of Trade Secrets
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • December 29 2016

Earlier this month, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that a party in litigation seeking to prevent responsive discoverable information from


Forum Shoppers Beware (But Not in Alabama)!
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • December 19 2016

Since non-compete law can vary drastically by state, many employers who operate in a multistate environment can benefit from utilizing


Uber vs. Cab Companies: Trade Secret Edition
  • Fisher Phillips
  • USA
  • July 6 2016

A state court in Florida recently ruled that the same categories of information maintained and possessed by government officials relating to two