We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 277

Lump sum under the carpet? Can't sweep 29 license agreements under reasonable royalty rug
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • November 29 2012

Ignoring prior licenses of the patent-in-suit can cause you to stub your toe when seeking reasonable royalty damages


RAND royalities refreshed - a primer for a modified Georgia - Pacific patent royalties test? (part I)
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 31 2013

RAND royalties are retaking center stage as a standards rule. In a 200-plus-page opinion tackling SSOs, SEPs, and RAND obligations, the district


Expert gets second chance
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 8 2013

Granting in part a Daubert motion, the Wi-Lan court found defects in the damages expert’s report. But, the court allowed the expert to amend his


Federal Circuit panel divides over indirect infringement law
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 11 2013

A split Federal Circuit Court of Appeals panel has determined that an accused inducer's good-faith belief in the invalidity of a patent may negate


Damages theories survive MSJ
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 29 2013

Denying a motion for summary judgment, the court in Interwoven concluded the patentee provided sufficient evidence to raise issues of fact regarding


Not so fast...Third Circuit leaves skid marks on ESI "costs"
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • January 30 2013

The brakes may have been applied to recovering all litigation expenses associated with electronically stored information (ESI) as "taxable costs,"


Court dismisses suit accusing LSU of fraudulent sweetener patent
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • July 18 2014

A California federal court has dismissed on jurisdictional grounds Quest Nutrition LLC's lawsuit against Louisiana State University Agricultural


Company seeks SCOTUS order allowing Federal Circuit to apply Alice standard
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2014

Advanced Biological Laboratories SA (ABL) has requested in a reply brief that the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) issue a GVR ordergrant its


Court focuses on Rule 30(b)(6) sets ‘established royalty’
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • April 8 2013

Don’t expect to avoid an “established royalty” if your Rule 30(b)(6) witness testifies that the patentee asks licensees to pay a fixed rate when it


Disgorgement proper remedy for contempt of injunction
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • March 29 2013

A Defendant seeking to limit contempt remedies to a reasonable royalty had no luck in ePlus Inc. Based on Supreme Court precedent, the court found