We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,911

Refusal to approve competitor's consumable material for use in 3D printers found not to amount to antitrust violation
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • June 3 2014

The Federal Circuit recently affirmed dismissal of a plaintiff’s federal antitrust claims, and its state-law claims for tortious interference and


Audi AG v. Shokan Coachworks, Inc., 2008 WL 4911730 (N.D.N.Y. 2008)
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 9 2008

The Northern District of New York decided cross-motions for summary judgment as to whether various uses of Audi's trademarks by a retailer of used Audi automobile parts infringed and diluted Audi's trademarks or constituted nominative fair uses


Adidas-America, Inc v Payless Shoesource, Inc
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 31 2008

After a jury trial awarding plaintiff $305 million in damages based on a reasonable royalty, an accounting of profits, and punitive damages, defendant moved for judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, and remittitur


Kairos Institute of Sound Healing, LLC v Doolittle Gardens, LLC
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • November 30 2008

The TTAB denied Applicant's motion for sanctions based upon Opposer's failure to make initial disclosures, and stated that sanctions are only available when a Board order has been violated or if a party affirmatively stated that it would not provide initial disclosures


A claim construction excluding the preferred embodiment Is “rarely, if ever, correct”
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • March 21 2013

Patent applications that describe a "preferred embodiment" often include claims directed to that embodiment. After all, if an embodiment is


CG Roxane LLC v. Fiji Water Co
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2008

The Northern District of California granted summary judgment of noninfringement, finding CG Roxane LLC's ("Roxane") registered mark BOTTLED AT THE SOURCE for bottled water invalid for genericness


Dessert Beauty, Inc v Fox
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • September 30 2008

Owner of registered trademark LOVE POTION for fragrances has no claim of infringement against company that uses the phrase "love potion" descriptively in identifying two of its fragrance products, the Southern District of New York recently held


USPTO backlog impacts biopharma industry
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • September 1 2008

Large pharmaceutical companies are increasingly turning to smaller biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies to supplement their drug development pipelines


In Re EMC Corp.: the Federal Circuit offers thoughts on joinder and transfer in multidefendant litigations
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • March 21 2013

On January 29, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its second mandamus decision in In re EMC Corp., 2013 WL 324154 (Fed


Guthy-Renker Corp. v. Boyd, Opposition no. 91182999 (TTAB 2008)
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • December 9 2008

Opposer filed a motion for sanctions based on Applicant's alleged failure to communicate with Opposer to arrange a discovery conference or to participate in the discovery conference