We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Collision course: conflict between United States Supreme Court and California judicial interpretation of arbitration agreements comes to a head
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP
  • USA
  • October 31 2010

In our April 2009 Employment Law Commentary, entitled “Arbitration Agreements in Light of 114 Penn Plaza v. Pyett,” we contrasted the United States Supreme Court’s and California courts’ approaches to enforcement of arbitration agreements

Timothy L. Reed
  • Morrison & Foerster LLP