We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 1,026

The AIA document B101-2007 Owner-Architect Agreement - who has rights to the instruments of service?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • February 29 2008

An architect is an artist


“Time is of the essence” finishing the work on time and what happens if the work is not finished on time
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 31 2008

The phrase “time is of the essence” can be found in most construction contracts today, but what does it mean?


Contractors pay high penalties for prevailing wage violations
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • May 7 2010

Prevailing wage is required on most Federal and Ohio construction projects


Court finds costs of hard copy production must be borne by requesting party; rejects magistrate judge’s analysis of cost-shifting under Zubulake; grants leave to seek cost-shifting under Rule 26(c)
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 20 2008

In this case, the differences between electronic production and hard copy production were starkly highlighted, as was the difference between “production” and “copying.”


Civil Rule 10(d)(2): an affidavit is required, but merit is entirely optional
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 2 2011

The Affidavit of Merit requirement in Rule 10(D)(2) was introduced in 2005 to eliminate frivolous lawsuits


Standard one-year warranty: fact or fiction?
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • April 30 2008

It is often heard from contractors, as well as owners, that “a contractor is not responsible for repairing work on a project outside of a year after the work is complete,” because the project is no longer covered by the contractor’s “standard one-year warranty.”


Petition Sixth Circuit holds that state court judgments that modify a discharge order are void ab initio
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • September 19 2008

On August 26, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a state court judgment that modifies a discharge order is void ab initio


Court upholds double damages and punitive damages for USERRA violation
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • March 26 2008

The federal Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects the employment rights and benefits of military service members on their return from military duty


Red Bull drops famous slogan after settlement of false advertising suit
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 7 2014

The once popular Red Bull slogan, "Red Bull gives you wings," is now a thing of the past. Red Bull was sued for false and deceptive advertising over


Construction surety bonds: buyers beware
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • May 21 2013

If you're in the market for construction surety bonds, let this article serve as a cautionary tale. Not all surety bonds are the same. Some types of