We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 10,772

Ten Foundation Questions for In-House Counsel About Form Arbitration Clauses
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 21 2017

Most arbitrations, and all commercial arbitrations, are creations of contract, and courts are generally required to enforce an arbitration agreement


CMS Proposes to Cancel Bundled Payment and Incentive Models
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 21 2017

The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published a proposed rule last week regarding the cancellation of three bundled payment models


District Courts Remain Split on TC Heartland and Waiver of Improper Venue Defense
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 21 2017

The Supreme Court’s decision five months ago in TC Heartland v. Kraft Food Group Brands was a sea change in the way courts interpret venue for patent


Massachusetts Employers Face $200 Million Increase in Health Care Costs under MassHealth Amendments
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 17 2017

On August 1, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker signed into law H. 3822, “An Act Further Regulating Employer Contributions to Health Care” (the


District Court Finds Hospital’s Joint Venture Not “Per Se” Unlawful
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 16 2017

On the eve of trial, and after years of litigation (including an appeal to the Sixth Circuit), all claims by Dayton, Ohio hospital The Medical Center


What Can You Say in the Workplace? Whatever Your Employer Allows You to Say .
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 16 2017

The recent controversy involving the Google employee fired for challenging his employer’s diversity policies highlights some misconceptions concerning


Dayton Hospital Antitrust Case Comes to an End: Joint Venture Activities Not “Per Se” Unlawful
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 16 2017

On the eve of trial, and after years of litigation (including an appeal to the Sixth Circuit), all claims by Dayton, Ohio hospital The Medical Center


What In-House Counsel Need To Know About Their Form Arbitration Clauses - Ten Foundation Questions
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 16 2017

Most arbitrations, and all commercial arbitrations, are creations of contract, and courts are generally required to enforce an arbitration agreement


New Tax Court Decision Provides Planning Opportunities for Foreign Investors Investing in U.S. Partnerships
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 16 2017

On July 13, 2017, the U.S. Tax Court issued its opinion in Grecian Magnesite Mining, Industrial & Shipping Co., SA v. Commissioner, in which the Tax


Federal Circuit Says PTO Submissions can Waive Privilege to Future Communications
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 15 2017

On July 20, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in In re OptumInsight denied OptumInsight’s petition for writ of mandamus