We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

California employers get a break on meal and rest claims but still face class action filings
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • April 18 2012

In a highly anticipated decision, on April 12 the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court held that employers are not obligated to ensure that nonexempt employees take their meal breaks

CA Court of Appeal finds three-arbitrator panel contract provision unenforceable
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • USA
  • September 10 2009

In Parada v. Superior Court, 2009 DJDAR 12745 (August 27, 2009), the Fourth District Court of Appeal held an arbitration clause in contracts between an investment company and its customers requiring a three-arbitrator panel was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable where the company failed to justify it

Erin C. Carroll
  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP