We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type



114 results found


Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 16 Jul 2019

Blair v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.

In McGill v. Citibank, N.A., 393 P.3d 85 (Cal. 2017), the California Supreme Court held that an agreement purporting to waive a party's right to seek


Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 22 Aug 2018

Section 230 Survives to Fight Another Day Following California Supreme Court Decision

As we have noted previously, the California Court of Appeal’s Hassell v. Bird decision in 2016 upholding an injunction requiring Yelp to remove


Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 23 Jun 2017

Supreme Court Says “No” to “Litigation Tourism”

There has been a lot said already about the effect on product liability (especially drug) cases and “mass actions” as a result of the United States


Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 25 May 2017

Employment Law Commentary - Volume 29, Issue 5

It took 124 years, but the California Supreme Court in Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc., No. S224611, 2017 WL 1833143 (Cal. May 8, 2017) finally addressed


Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 26 Sep 2016

Social Links: Yelp’s Communications Decency Act claim; Twitter loosens its character limit; building a Snapchat audience

The California Supreme Court agreed to hear Yelp’s case arguing that requiring the company to remove a one-star review of a law firm “creates a gaping


Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 1 Aug 2016

California Adopts the Sophisticated Intermediary Doctrine

In a recent opinion, the Supreme Court of California formally adopted the Sophisticated Intermediary Doctrine, clarifying what circumstances may


Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 5 May 2016

Employment Law Commentary, April 2016

Most of the California Industrial Welfare Commission’s industry and occupational wage orders contain a two-sentence provision requiring employers to


Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 1 Apr 2016

California Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration Agreements That Mutually Exclude Applications for Temporary Restraining Orders and Preliminary Injunctions

On Monday, March 28, 2016, the California Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Second Appellate District holding that an arbitration agreement


Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 31 Dec 2015

California Supreme Court Unanimously Holds Against Gillette

Concluding that the California Legislature (1) is not bound by the Multistate Tax Compact (the “Compact”), (2) had unilateral authority to eliminate


Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 21 Dec 2015

CEQA Doesn’t Operate in “Reverse” (Usually)

It's not quite Star Wars, but in the world of land use, this counts as a blockbuster. The California Supreme Court has decided unanimously that the

Previous page 1 2 3 ...