We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 170

Court holds relevance of records to litigation must have been apparent at time they were destroyed
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 28 2008

This is an age discrimination case, brought by a UPS driver who was fired because of his age, according to plaintiff, or because he was stealing time sleeping on the job, taking excessive rest breaks, and inaccurately recording meal and rest breaks according to UPS


The truth about the BWC settlement
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2014

In late July, San Allen Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation was settled for $420 million. The case involved a large class of private


The truth about the BWC settlement
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 26 2014

In late July, the San Allen Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation case was settled for $420 million. This case involved a large class of


Officer terminations: National Bank Act preemption
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 27 2008

The Ohio Ninth District Court of Appeals recently held that an officer of an Ohio national bank could not pursue state law claims of sex discrimination during her employment because the claims were preempted by the National Bank Act


Court finds costs of hard copy production must be borne by requesting party; rejects magistrate judge’s analysis of cost-shifting under Zubulake; grants leave to seek cost-shifting under Rule 26(c)
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • August 20 2008

In this case, the differences between electronic production and hard copy production were starkly highlighted, as was the difference between “production” and “copying.”


Could this be you? Business expansion and your BWC experience rating
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • December 11 2014

The Ohio Supreme Court recently issued a decision holding that, following the purchase and transfer of a company's assets, clients, or employees, the


FLSA filings on the uptick
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • November 20 2014

A recent federal court case out of New York included data that employers might find interesting. According to Judge Pauley of the Southern District


Abercrombie discrimination case goes before the Supreme Court
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • February 26 2015

Abercrombie's latest legal saga hit a crescendo yesterday. The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments inEEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc


Update on recent whistleblower False Claims Act settlements
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • May 1 2014

On March 21, 2014, Duke University Health System, Inc. of Raleigh, North Carolina, agreed to pay $1 million to the United States Department of


Ohio Supreme Court rules on workers' compensation coverage of mental health conditions
  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • USA
  • June 6 2013

On June 4, 2013, the Ohio Supreme Court found that mental health conditions are covered under Ohio workers' compensation law only when they are