We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Clear all

Refine your search

1 results found

Article

Sidley Austin LLP | USA | 28 Jun 2010

DOL interprets FMLA to cover employees who assume parental obligations regarding a child even absent a biological or legal relationship to the child

On June 22, 2010, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued an interpretation of provisions of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. 2601 et. seq. (FMLA), defining the terms “son or daughter” as they apply to an employee taking leave for the purpose of caring for a child.

Previous page 1 Next page