We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Clear all

Refine your search

1 results found

Article

Reed Smith LLP | USA | 12 Apr 2010

U.S. Supreme Court holds that Gartenberg is the standard to assess whether a mutual fund adviser has violated Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940

On March 30, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided Jones v. Harris Associates, L.P., No. 08-586, 556 U.S. ___ (2010), addressing the appropriate legal standard for assessing claims against mutual fund investment advisers and their affiliates under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Section 36(b)").

Previous page 1 Next page