We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Clear all

Refine your search

3 results found


Jones Day | USA | 2 Dec 2016

In Brief: Delaware Bankruptcy Court Clarifies Burden of Proof for Automatic Stay Relief

In In re Abeinsa Holding, Inc., 2016 BL 335099 (Bankr. D. Del. Oct. 6, 2016), the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware addressed what


Jones Day | USA | 13 Oct 2011

History matters: historical breaches may undermine assumption of executory contracts

One of the primary fights underlying assumption of an unexpired lease or executory contract has long been over whether any debtor breaches under the agreement are “curable.” Before the 2005 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, courts were split over whether historic nonmonetary breaches (such as a failure to maintain cash reserves or prescribed hours of operation) undermined a debtor’s ability to assume the lease or contract.


Jones Day | USA | 1 Jun 2011

Bankruptcy claims traders beware: ensure that the cure comes with the claim

Over the past five years, courts have issued rulings of potential concern to buyers of distressed debt.

Previous page 1 Next page