We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Clear all

Refine your search

7 results found

Article

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | 17 Aug 2016

Alberta Court of Appeal Certifies National Class Action

The Alberta Court of Appeal recently allowed an appeal in Warner v Smith & Nephew Inc., overturning a lower court decision declining to certify a

Article

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | 10 Feb 2016

Court affirms deferring jurisdiction to Legislatively established specialized tribunals

On February 9, 2016 Madam Justice Kim Nixon of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench issued a significant administrative law decision in the case of

Article

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | 3 Sep 2014

Walton v Alberta (Securities Commission)

On August 29, 2014, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in Walton v Alberta(Securities Commission), 2014 ABCA 723 ("Walton"). The

Article

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | 20 Aug 2014

Alberta insider trading cases

The July 8 2014 acquittal of Rengam Rajaratnam in New York District Court ended a long streak of insider trading convictions in that jurisdiction

Article

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | 28 May 2014

Transalta complaint about Market Surveillance Administrator dismissed by Alberta Utilities Commission

One of the roles of the Alberta Utilities Commission is to regulate the conduct of Alberta electricity market participants so as to promote a fair

Article

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | 7 May 2013

Insider trading better safe than sorry

A series of recent Alberta Securities Commission decisions recently underscored the inherent dangers of buying or selling securities of companies in

Article

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | 5 Jan 2010

Brokers’ report

On October 13, 2009, Justice Scott Brooker of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta released his written reasons for decision in the case of Soost v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc.

Previous page 1 Next page