We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Clear all

Refine your search

23 results found

Article

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP | USA | 29 Sep 2016

Sixth Circuit Underscores Importance Of Moving For A Stay After Entry Of Judgment In Foreclosure Proceedings

On September 9, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a decision that parties in foreclosure proceedings should read

Article

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP | USA | 6 May 2015

Ohio Supreme Court confirms that a foreclosure plaintiff may submit proof of standing subsequent to filing the complaint

In what most pundits agreed would be a swift reversal, the Ohio Supreme Court did in fact unanimously reverse the Ninth District Court of Appeals in

Article

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP | USA | 9 Dec 2014

An Ohio alternative foreclosure sales conducted by a special master

Lenders can typically credit bid at sheriff's sales in an amount well in excess of the minimum bid requirements, as a result of which some real

Article

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP | USA | 28 May 2014

Ohio foreclosure procedure . . . twice the appeal

Earlier this month the Supreme Court of Ohio resolved a split of authority between the Fifth District and Seventh District regarding whether a

Article

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP | USA | 22 May 2014

FBI increases criminal fraud investigations by 65, director reports

FBI Director James Comey shared the Bureau's enforcement trends and objectives at the New York City Bar Association's Third Annual White Collar Crime

Article

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP | USA | 25 Apr 2014

Ohio Supreme Court to address issues arising in Schwartzwald’s wake

As all professionals whose business involves the prosecution of foreclosures in Ohio almost certainly know by now, the Ohio Supreme Court's decision

Article

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP | USA | 6 Mar 2014

Ohio Supreme Court resolves certified conflict regarding oral forbearance agreements

Last Spring, we discussed on this blog a trifecta of noteworthy lending cases pending before the Ohio Supreme Court. Today, the Court resolved one of

Article

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP | USA | 22 Nov 2013

Agreeing to renegotiate a loan does not waive lender’s right to foreclose

In its Oct. 30, 2013 decision in General Electric Capital Corporation v. Tartan Fields Gold Club, Ltd., et al., 2013-Ohio-4875, the Fifth District

Article

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP | USA | 8 May 2013

Ohio's 10th Appellate District finds debtor lacks standing to challenge assignee's power to enforce loan documents

In a decision that will hearten commercial lawyers, on April 23, 2013, Ohio's Court of Appeals for the Tenth Appellate District relied on lack of

Article

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP | USA | 2 May 2013

An Ohio Supreme Court "trifecta" of noteworthy lending cases on the docket

At the end of April, the Ohio Supreme Court agreed to hear three notable cases that readers of this blog may wish to monitor - or perhaps even

Previous page 1 2 3