We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Clear all

Refine your search

3 results found


Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | USA | 8 Dec 2015

Who Bears Liability For That Call Or Fax? Courts Continue To Wrestle With Direct And Vicarious Liability

Whenever more than one individual or entity is allegedly involved in the "sending" of a fax or the making of a call or text, two key questions in the


Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | USA | 2 Sep 2014

FCC letter brief suggests that faxes and phone calls are different for purposes of direct liability under the TCPA

At the invitation of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the FCC recently filed a letter brief in Palm Beach Golf Center-Boca, Inc. v. Sarris, No


Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | USA | 29 Jan 2014

D.C. Circuit Dish Network decision fails to clear the muddied TCPA waters of a seller’s vicarious liability

On January 22, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed Dish Network LLC's petition for review of a

Previous page 1 Next page