We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

3 results found

Article

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | USA | 22 Jul 2011

The importer doth not protest enough, methinks: A review of the Court of International Trade’s recent ruling regarding the jurisdictional sufficiency of an administrative protest

In a recent ruling, the Court of International Trade provided guidance on the preparation of administrative protests.

Article

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | USA | 1 May 2008

CIT rules that CBP notice of action is an “interpretive ruling or decision” subject to notice-and-comment requirements

In International Custom Products, Inc. v. United States, Slip op. 08-36 (March 31, 2008), the Court of International Trade (CIT) denied, in part, a motion to dismiss brought by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on the court’s holding that the agency should be subject to the notice-and-comment requirements under 19 U.S.C. 1625(c) when it issues a Notice of Action, or CBP Form 29, which has the effect of revoking a previous ruling issued to the importer.

Article

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | USA | 7 Aug 2007

Retaliation against Byrd Amendment continues

Japan has decided to continue to impose 15 percent duties on 15 items imported from the United States, in retaliation against the U.S. Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, also known as the “Byrd Amendment.”

Previous page 1 Next page