We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 93

IP Litigation in the Cannabis Industry: A Review of the Limited Authority in Canada Thus Far
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • Canada
  • September 26 2018

As the day draws near to the legalization of recreational cannabis in Canada, so too does the birth of a new and significant industry. Arguably


ONSC educates an inventor on the difference between obtaining a Patent and maintaining a Trade Secret
  • PCK Perry + Currier Inc Currier + Kao LLP
  • Canada
  • May 8 2018

Not understanding the differences between intellectual property rights or learning about their ownership implications could prove to be dangerous


Global Government Solutions 2016: Mid-Year Outlook
  • K&L Gates
  • USA, Australia, United Kingdom, Canada, European Union, Germany, Global
  • July 1 2016

As we issue this 2016 Mid-Year Outlook, the global community has begun to wrestle in earnest with the momentous political, economic, and doing


Intellectual property due diligence in an investment context
  • Lavery de Billy LLP
  • Canada
  • September 1 2015

A due diligence analysis of intellectual property rights is an important step when acquiring or making a significant investment in a business. It is


La vérification diligente de la Propriété intellectuelle dans un contexte d’investissement
  • Lavery de Billy LLP
  • Canada
  • September 1 2015

La vérification diligente des droits de propriété intellectuelle constitue une étape importante lors de l’acquisition d’une entreprise ou lorsqu’on y


Adding a related corporate plaintiff to a statement of claim after the limitation period is allowed when it is correcting a misnomer
  • Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Canada
  • May 5 2014

Although this action for damages in relation to the alleged receipt and misuse of confidential information is over six years old, it is still in the