We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 22

Inv. No. 337-TA-776 terminated as to respondent Pass & Seymour based on consent order
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 14 2011

ALJ Essex issued an initial determination granting respondent Pass & Seymour, Inc.’s motion to terminate Investigation No. 337-TA-776, Certain Lighting Control Devices Including Dimmer Switches and Parts Thereof (IV), based on consent order.


Inv. No. 337-TA-804 terminated as to respondent Visio Light, Inc
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • November 14 2011

On November 8, 2011, ALJ Essex issued an order terminating respondent Visio Light, Inc. from Investigation No. 337-TA-804, Certain LED Photographic Lighting Devices and Components Thereof, based on entry of a consent order.


Target date set in Inv. no. 337-TA-808
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 5 2011

ALJ E. James Gildea issued an Initial Determination on October 4, 2011 that, among other things, sets the target date for Certain Electronic Devices with Communication Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Related Software, 337-TA-808.


New request for investigation filed against Apple, Inc.
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 27 2011

On September 22, VIA Technologies Inc., IP-First LLC, and Centaur Technology Inc. filed a letter with Secretary Holbein requesting that the Commission conduct an investigation under section 337 regarding Certain Computing Devices with Associated Instruction Sets and Software.


Commission declines review of ID granting summary determination in automated library devices investigation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 22 2011

On September 21, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review an initial determination granting Respondent BDT Solutions' motion for summary determination that no violation of section 337 occurred in Inv. No. 337-TA-746, Certain Automated Media Library Devices, due to lack of importation.


ALJ orders eight respondents to show cause to avoid default in Inv. no. 337-TA-780
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 12 2011

ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued an order on September 9, 2011 directing certain Respondents to show cause why they should not be found in default by the close of business on September 23, 2011, in Certain Protective Cases and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-780.


HTC asserts additional patents in proposed certain electronic devices investigation
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 8 2011

On September 7, 2011, HTC Corp. submitted an amendment to its complaint filed on August 16, 2011 with the ITC.


Commission decides to review the final initial determination in Inv. No. 337-TA-724
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • September 6 2011

On September 2, 2011, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a notice that it will review a final initial determination (“ID”) made in Certain Electronic Devices with Image Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software.


ALJ Rogers denies motion to file out of time
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 26 2011

ALJ Rogers denied Respondent Realtek Semiconductor Corporation's motion to file high priority objections and motion in limine out of time in Inv. No. 337-TA-749, Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices, Including Monitors, Televisions, and Modules, and Components Thereof.


Parties file joint motion to terminate respondent Hard Candy Cases
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 26 2011

Complainant Otter Products, LLC and Respondent Hardy Candy Cases LLC dba Gumdrop LLC filed a joint motion to terminate Respondent Hard Candy on the basis of a consent order in Inv. No. 337-TA-780, Certain Protective Cases and Components Thereof.