We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Clear all

Refine your search

Content type
Tags
Author

7 results found

Audio

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 12 Dec 2018

Nota Bene Episode 15: C-Suite Trades: Three Developments Insiders Need to Know

The rules surrounding insider trading and securities violations are extensive and can be complicated. In order to determine if an executive selling or

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 13 Jul 2018

New York Court of Appeals Rules that Civil Securities Fraud Claims Brought Under Martin Act are Subject to Three-Year Statute of Limitations

In People v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, No. 40, 2018 WL 2899299 (N.Y. June 12, 2018), the Court of Appeals for the State of New York ruled

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 26 Jun 2018

You Might Be an Inside Trader IfYou Trade on Your Unconfirmed Suspicions of a Cybersecurity Event Prior to Its Public Revelation or Disclosure

Earlier this year, the SEC released cybersecurity guidance addressing, among other things, the risk of insider trading in the event of a data breach

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 28 Sep 2010

Second Circuit rejects application of "bespeaks caution" doctrine to statement containing both historical and forward-looking elements

In Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v MF Global, Ltd, No 09-3919, 2010 WL 3547602 (2d Cir Sept 14, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the dismissal of plaintiffs' securities fraud claims and remanded the case to the district court, holding that the district court applied the "bespeaks caution" doctrine erroneously to statements that contained both present and future elements.

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 6 Apr 2010

In Omnicom Second Circuit provides guidance on what type of information will justify investor reliance for securities fraud

In re Omnicom Group, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 08-0612-CV, 2010 WL 774311 (2d Cir. Mar. 9, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing a securities fraud class action for failure to proffer sufficient evidence to support a finding of loss causation.

Previous page 1 Next page