AND	term1 AND term2	Both terms must be included
OR	term1 OR term2	Either term
NOT	term1 NOT term2	term2 must not appear
""	"term1 term2"	Exact match
()	term1 AND (term2 OR term3)	Grouping terms
?	withdr?w	Single letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrew)
*	withdr*	Multiple letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrawn, withdrawing)
"..."~n	"term1 term2"~n	Proximity (term1 within n words of term2)

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Jurisdiction

Work area

Firm name

Date from

Date to

Results:1-10 of 7,420

Brazil patent examination: Defying the backlog

DANIEL Legal & IP Strategy
Brazil
December 19 2018

Despite a reputation for being slow to grant patents, Brazil’s IP office has introduced a number of programmes to expedite examinationwith some

Timing

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
USA
December 18 2018

Our timing statistics track time to the posting of a PTAB Final Written Decision on the merits. These statistics do not include requests for adverse

Trade Show Publication Dooms Patent in IPR Appeal Despite Contrary Decision in ITC Appeal

Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP
USA
December 17 2018

Inter partes review not only provides a faster and cheaper way to challenge patent validity, but also expands the Patent Office’s ability to develop

Window into the Past

Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC
USA
December 14 2018

Patents can be an interesting window into the past. On December 14, 1937, for example, U.S. Patent No. D107425 issued to Wallace K. Harrison and J

DOJ to Withdraw Assent to Standards-Essential Patent Policy Statement

Latham & Watkins LLP
USA
December 14 2018

Assistant Attorney General Makan Derahim has announced that the Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) Antitrust Division will withdraw its assent to the

Motion to Amend Denied for Failure to Meet 42.121 Requirements

Jones Day
USA
December 13 2018

On November 26, 2018, the PTAB entered its Final Written Decision in Intel Corp. v. Alacritech, Inc., Case IPR2017-01391, denying Patent Owner

Federal Circuit Holds 156 Patent Term Extension Not Invalid for Obviousness-Type Double Patenting

Venable LLP
USA
December 13 2018

On December 7, 2018, a Federal Circuit panel (Moore, Chen, and Hughes) in Novartis AG v. Ezra Ventures LLC, No. 2017-2284, held that a patent term

Click-to-Call Cert Petition - Second Extension of Time Granted

Jones Day
USA
December 12 2018

As reported in a prior post, DexMedia, Inc. previously filed an Application for Extension of Time to File a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari

Recent Federal Circuit Decisions on Obviousness-Type Double Patenting May Shape Life Science Patent Portfolio Management

Dechert LLP
USA
December 12 2018

The Federal Circuit recently decided two appeals, Novartis AG v. Ezra Ventures LLC ("Ezra") and Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Breckenridge Pharm. Inc.

2019 to Bring Clarity to 101 Disputes

Ropes & Gray LLP
USA
December 11 2018

As we close out 2018, there may be some hope on the horizon for those confounded by the current state of patent eligibility determinations under 35 U

Search techniques

Current Search

Refine

Content type

Tags